Demographics - Revision history

InternetArchiveBot: Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

2023-07-19T10:36:26Z

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 19 July 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:
	''More information needed.''		''More information needed.''

	In the 2021 [[Gender Census]], there were over 44,000 respondents.<ref name="GC2021">{{Cite web \|title=The 2021 Gender Census is now officially closed! \|author= \|work=Gender Census \|date=10 March 2021 \|access-date=10 March 2021 \|url= https://gendercensus.tumblr.com/post/645271496545140736/the-2021-gender-census-is-now-open\|archive-url=~~False~~ \|archive-date=17 July 2023 }}</ref> However this is a limited set (e.g. mainly English-speaking people who use social media) and thus does not represent a full global count of people who identify outside the [[gender binary]].		In the 2021 [[Gender Census]], there were over 44,000 respondents.<ref name="GC2021">{{Cite web \|title=The 2021 Gender Census is now officially closed! \|author= \|work=Gender Census \|date=10 March 2021 \|access-date=10 March 2021 \|url=https://gendercensus.tumblr.com/post/645271496545140736/the-2021-gender-census-is-now-open \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230719103618/https://gendercensus.tumblr.com/post/645271496545140736/the-2021-gender-census-is-now-open \|archive-date=19 July 2023 \|url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref> However this is a limited set (e.g. mainly English-speaking people who use social media) and thus does not represent a full global count of people who identify outside the [[gender binary]].

	==Australia==		==Australia==

BinaryBot: Bot: adding archive links to references (error log).

2023-07-17T12:51:00Z

Bot: adding archive links to references (error log).

Show changes

Amazingakita: /* United Kingdom */

2023-01-06T13:14:06Z

United Kingdom

imported>TXJ: /* United States Trans Survey */

2021-06-24T16:12:50Z

United States Trans Survey

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 24 June 2021
Line 62:		Line 62:
	*and 12% of respondents wrote in a gender not listed by the survey		*and 12% of respondents wrote in a gender not listed by the survey

	Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 [[nonbinary]] individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|~~author1~~=Hendrick \|~~author2~~=Meneghello \|~~author3~~= Behymer\|work=~~Fisher Phillips~~ \|date=1 January 2018 ~~\|access-date=19 June 2020~~ \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>		Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 nonbinary individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|last1=Hendrick \|first1=Janet \|last2=Meneghello \|first2=Richard \|last3= Behymer\|first3=Cheryl \|work=Law Week Colorado \|date=11 January 2018 \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180318162613/http://lawweekcolorado.com:80/2018/01/m-f-x-nonbinary-gender-designations-workplace/\|archive-date=18 March 2018}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>

	===Williams Institute study===		===Williams Institute study===

imported>TXJ: /* USA */

2021-06-24T16:02:44Z

USA

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 24 June 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==USA==		==USA==
	A large-scale survey of "transgender, trans, genderqueer, and non-binary" people was conducted in 2015: the United States Trans Survey (USTS). In total there were 27,715 respondents, 35% of whom (9,769 people) "indicated that their gender identity was best described as nonbinary or genderqueer." However, a greater number (13,353 people or 48%) answered "Yes" to the question "Do you identify as [[multigender\|more than one gender]] or as [[agender\|no gender]]?"<ref name="2015USTS-AppA">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|~~page~~=Appendix A}}</ref> This echoes Titman's finding above, that question phrasing will affect the reported number of nonbinary/genderqueer people.		===United States Trans Survey===
			A large-scale survey of "transgender, trans, genderqueer, and non-binary" people was conducted in 2015: the United States Trans Survey (USTS). In total there were 27,715 respondents, 35% of whom (9,769 people) "indicated that their gender identity was best described as nonbinary or genderqueer." However, a greater number (13,353 people or 48%) answered "Yes" to the question "Do you identify as [[multigender\|more than one gender]] or as [[agender\|no gender]]?"<ref name="2015USTS-AppA">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|at=Appendix A}}</ref> This echoes Titman's finding above, that question phrasing will affect the reported number of nonbinary/genderqueer people.

	The USTS included a list of gender terms allowing respondents to check off multiple selections, as well as the option to write in a gender that wasn't listed. From this section of the survey:<ref name="2015USTS-44">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|page=44}}</ref>		The USTS included a list of gender terms allowing respondents to check off multiple selections, as well as the option to write in a gender that wasn't listed. From this section of the survey:<ref name="2015USTS-44">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|page=44}}</ref>
Line 62:		Line 63:

	Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 [[nonbinary]] individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|author1=Hendrick \|author2=Meneghello \|author3= Behymer\|work=Fisher Phillips \|date=1 January 2018 \|access-date=19 June 2020 \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>		Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 [[nonbinary]] individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|author1=Hendrick \|author2=Meneghello \|author3= Behymer\|work=Fisher Phillips \|date=1 January 2018 \|access-date=19 June 2020 \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>

			===Williams Institute study===
			Another study, published in June 2021 by the Williams Institute, used data from the Generations Study and the TransPop Study (data collected between 2016 and 2018). The Williams Institute study estimated that (within the LGBTQ community) there are around 1,219,000 nonbinary adults in the USA.<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Nonbinary-LGBTQ-Adults-Jun-2021.pdf\|title=Nonbinary LGBTQ Adults in the United States \|date=June 2021\|last1=Wilson\|first1=Bianca D.M.\|last2=Meyer\|first2=Ilan H.\|publisher=The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law}}</ref>

	===USA subpopulations===		===USA subpopulations===

imported>TXJ: /* Worldwide */

2021-03-10T19:33:36Z

Worldwide

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 10 March 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	''More information needed.''		''More information needed.''

	In the ~~2020~~ [[Gender Census]], there were 24,~~576~~ respondents.<ref name="~~GC2020~~">{{Cite web \|title=Gender Census ~~2020: The Pronoun Question~~ \|author=~~Cassian~~ \|work=Gender Census \|date=~~16 October 2020~~ \|access-date=~~23 October 2020~~ \|url= https://gendercensus.com/post/~~632150168128700416~~/gender-census-~~2020-the~~-~~pronoun~~-~~question~~}}</ref> However this is a limited set (e.g. mainly English-speaking people who use ~~Tumblr and/or Twitter~~) and thus does not represent a full global count of people who identify outside the [[gender binary]].		In the 2021 [[Gender Census]], there were over 44,000 respondents.<ref name="GC2021">{{Cite web \|title=The 2021 Gender Census is now officially closed! \|author= \|work=Gender Census \|date=10 March 2021 \|access-date=10 March 2021 \|url= https://gendercensus.tumblr.com/post/645271496545140736/the-2021-gender-census-is-now-open}}</ref> However this is a limited set (e.g. mainly English-speaking people who use social media) and thus does not represent a full global count of people who identify outside the [[gender binary]].

	==Australia==		==Australia==

imported>TXJ: /* Australia */

2020-11-10T20:53:43Z

Australia

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 10 November 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Australia==		==Australia==
	On the 2016 Australian Census, for the first time people could identify themselves as "male", "female", or "[[other]]". 1300 people selected "other".<ref name="power2017">{{Cite web \|title=Being gender non-binary on the Census, dyke is a dirty word and Ramadan fundraising \|author=Power, Shannon \|work=The Informer \|date=28 June 2017 \|access-date=15 October 2020 \|url= https://joy.org.au/theinformer/2017/06/28/gender-non-binary-census-dyke-dirty-word-ramadan-fundraising/}}</ref>		On the 2016 Australian Census, for the first time people could identify themselves as "male", "female", or "[[other]]". 1300 people selected "other".<ref name="power2017">{{Cite web \|title=Being gender non-binary on the Census, dyke is a dirty word and Ramadan fundraising \|author=Power, Shannon \|work=The Informer \|date=28 June 2017 \|access-date=15 October 2020 \|url= https://joy.org.au/theinformer/2017/06/28/gender-non-binary-census-dyke-dirty-word-ramadan-fundraising/}}</ref> However, the "other" option was only available through an opt-in process, not a standard census option, so the count is likely lower than the actual number of nonbinary Australians.<ref>https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2007.0main+features62021</ref>

	==Canada==		==Canada==

imported>TXJ: /* Edmonton */

2020-11-10T20:41:16Z

Edmonton

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 10 November 2020
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, had a municipal census in 2016 which allowed people to identify as "man/boy", "woman/girl", or "other". 1,212 people selected "other"; this was about 0.135% of the total municipal population (total 899,447).<ref name="Riebe">{{Cite web \|title=Transgender, non-binary, two-spirit options on Edmonton census for first time \|last=Riebe \|first=Natasha \|work=CBC \|date=29 March 2019 \|access-date=10 November 2020 \|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-2019-municipal-census-gender-identity-options-1.5077306}}</ref>		Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, had a municipal census in 2016 which allowed people to identify as "man/boy", "woman/girl", or "other". 1,212 people selected "other"; this was about 0.135% of the total municipal population (total 899,447).<ref name="Riebe">{{Cite web \|title=Transgender, non-binary, two-spirit options on Edmonton census for first time \|last=Riebe \|first=Natasha \|work=CBC \|date=29 March 2019 \|access-date=10 November 2020 \|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-2019-municipal-census-gender-identity-options-1.5077306}}</ref>

	In the 2019 Edmonton census, the gender options were changed to "Man/boy", "Woman/girl", "Trans ~~Mman~~", "Trans Woman", "[[Two-Spirit]]", "[[Non-binary]]", "Another gender", or "Prefer not to answer". The total population was 972,223; 284 people were Two-Spirit, 717 were nonbinary, 289 chose the "~~other~~ gender" option, and 94,315 people preferred not to answer. This makes a total count of 1,290 people who reported a gender identity that was not a binary gender; that's about 0.133% of the city's population.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/profile/city.of.edmonton#!/vizhome/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensus/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensusPopulationbyAgeRangeandGender 2019 Edmonton Municipal Census (Population by Age Range and Gender)]</ref> (The actual count of nonbinary people may be higher due to the large number of people who chose not to report their gender.)		In the 2019 Edmonton census, the gender options were changed to "Man/boy", "Woman/girl", "Trans Man", "Trans Woman", "[[Two-Spirit]]", "[[Non-binary]]", "Another gender", or "Prefer not to answer". The total population was 972,223; 284 people were Two-Spirit, 717 were nonbinary, 289 chose the "another gender" option, and 94,315 people preferred not to answer. This makes a total count of 1,290 people who reported a gender identity that was not a binary gender; that's about 0.133% of the city's population.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/profile/city.of.edmonton#!/vizhome/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensus/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensusPopulationbyAgeRangeandGender 2019 Edmonton Municipal Census (Population by Age Range and Gender)]</ref> (The actual count of nonbinary people may be higher due to the large number of people who chose not to report their gender.)

	===Ontario===		===Ontario===

imported>TXJ: /* Edmonton */

2020-11-10T20:40:27Z

Edmonton

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 10 November 2020
Line 26:		Line 26:

	===Edmonton===		===Edmonton===
	Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, had a municipal census in 2016 which allowed people to identify as "man/boy", "woman/girl", or "other". 1,212 people selected "other"; this was about 0.135% of the municipal population.<ref name="Riebe">{{Cite web \|title=Transgender, non-binary, two-spirit options on Edmonton census for first time \|last=Riebe \|first=Natasha \|work=CBC \|date=29 March 2019 \|access-date=10 November 2020 \|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-2019-municipal-census-gender-identity-options-1.5077306}}</ref>		Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, had a municipal census in 2016 which allowed people to identify as "man/boy", "woman/girl", or "other". 1,212 people selected "other"; this was about 0.135% of the total municipal population (total 899,447).<ref name="Riebe">{{Cite web \|title=Transgender, non-binary, two-spirit options on Edmonton census for first time \|last=Riebe \|first=Natasha \|work=CBC \|date=29 March 2019 \|access-date=10 November 2020 \|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-2019-municipal-census-gender-identity-options-1.5077306}}</ref>

			In the 2019 Edmonton census, the gender options were changed to "Man/boy", "Woman/girl", "Trans Mman", "Trans Woman", "[[Two-Spirit]]", "[[Non-binary]]", "Another gender", or "Prefer not to answer". The total population was 972,223; 284 people were Two-Spirit, 717 were nonbinary, 289 chose the "other gender" option, and 94,315 people preferred not to answer. This makes a total count of 1,290 people who reported a gender identity that was not a binary gender; that's about 0.133% of the city's population.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/profile/city.of.edmonton#!/vizhome/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensus/2019EdmontonMunicipalCensusPopulationbyAgeRangeandGender 2019 Edmonton Municipal Census (Population by Age Range and Gender)]</ref> (The actual count of nonbinary people may be higher due to the large number of people who chose not to report their gender.)

	===Ontario===		===Ontario===

imported>TXJ: /* Canada */

2020-11-10T20:29:52Z

Canada

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 10 November 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:

	In the first Canadian Trans Youth Health Survey (CTYHS, open from October 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014), surveying 923 non-cisgender Canadians between the ages of 14–25, 41% of respondents were nonbinary.<ref>{{cite journal\|last1=Frohard-Dourlent\|first1=Hélène \|last2=Dobson \|first2=Sarah\|last3= Clark\|first3= Beth A.\|last4=Doull\|first4= Marion\|last5= Saewyc\|first5= Elizabeth M.\|year=2016\|title="I would have preferred more options": accounting for non-binary youth in health research\|journal=Nursing Inquiry\|doi=10.1111/nin.12150}}</ref>		In the first Canadian Trans Youth Health Survey (CTYHS, open from October 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014), surveying 923 non-cisgender Canadians between the ages of 14–25, 41% of respondents were nonbinary.<ref>{{cite journal\|last1=Frohard-Dourlent\|first1=Hélène \|last2=Dobson \|first2=Sarah\|last3= Clark\|first3= Beth A.\|last4=Doull\|first4= Marion\|last5= Saewyc\|first5= Elizabeth M.\|year=2016\|title="I would have preferred more options": accounting for non-binary youth in health research\|journal=Nursing Inquiry\|doi=10.1111/nin.12150}}</ref>

			===Edmonton===
			Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, had a municipal census in 2016 which allowed people to identify as "man/boy", "woman/girl", or "other". 1,212 people selected "other"; this was about 0.135% of the municipal population.<ref name="Riebe">{{Cite web \|title=Transgender, non-binary, two-spirit options on Edmonton census for first time \|last=Riebe \|first=Natasha \|work=CBC \|date=29 March 2019 \|access-date=10 November 2020 \|url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-2019-municipal-census-gender-identity-options-1.5077306}}</ref>

	===Ontario===		===Ontario===

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 6 January 2023
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==United Kingdom==		==United Kingdom==
	According to a 2014 blog post by activist [[Nat Titman]], "at least 0.4% of the UK population defines as nonbinary when given a 3-way choice in terms of female, male or another description", but the count will be higher depending on variations in question phrasing.<ref name="Titman2014">{{Cite web \|title=How many people in the United Kingdom are nonbinary? \|author=Titman, Nat \|authorlink=Nat Titman \|work=Practical Androgyny \|date=16 December 2014 \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://practicalandrogyny.com/2014/12/16/how-many-people-in-the-uk-are-nonbinary/}}</ref>		According to a 2014 blog post by activist [[Nat Titman]], "at least 0.4% of the UK population defines as nonbinary when given a 3-way choice in terms of female, male or another description", but the count will be higher depending on variations in question phrasing.<ref name="Titman2014">{{Cite web \|title=How many people in the United Kingdom are nonbinary? \|author=Titman, Nat \|authorlink=Nat Titman \|work=Practical Androgyny \|date=16 December 2014 \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://practicalandrogyny.com/2014/12/16/how-many-people-in-the-uk-are-nonbinary/}}</ref>

			According to the 2021 ONS Census for England and Wales<ref>{{Cite web\|title=ONS 2021 Gender Results \|author=Office of National Statistics (ONS) \|access-date=6 January 2023 \|url=https://twitter.com/ONS/status/1611295339746660352\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230106130837/https://twitter.com/ONS/status/1611295339746660352\|archive-date=6 January 2023}}</ref>, 0.06% of the population is nonbinary, while a further 0.04% wrote in their own responses. 0.24% of respondents did not choose to elaborate past "Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?".

	==USA==		==USA==
Line 40:		Line 42:
	A large-scale survey of "transgender, trans, genderqueer, and non-binary" people was conducted in 2015: the United States Trans Survey (USTS). In total there were 27,715 respondents, 35% of whom (9,769 people) "indicated that their gender identity was best described as nonbinary or genderqueer." However, a greater number (13,353 people or 48%) answered "Yes" to the question "Do you identify as [[multigender\|more than one gender]] or as [[agender\|no gender]]?"<ref name="2015USTS-AppA">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|at=Appendix A}}</ref> This echoes Titman's finding above, that question phrasing will affect the reported number of nonbinary/genderqueer people.		A large-scale survey of "transgender, trans, genderqueer, and non-binary" people was conducted in 2015: the United States Trans Survey (USTS). In total there were 27,715 respondents, 35% of whom (9,769 people) "indicated that their gender identity was best described as nonbinary or genderqueer." However, a greater number (13,353 people or 48%) answered "Yes" to the question "Do you identify as [[multigender\|more than one gender]] or as [[agender\|no gender]]?"<ref name="2015USTS-AppA">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|at=Appendix A}}</ref> This echoes Titman's finding above, that question phrasing will affect the reported number of nonbinary/genderqueer people.

	The USTS included a list of gender terms allowing respondents to check off multiple selections, as well as the option to write in a gender that wasn't listed. From this section of the survey:<ref name="2015USTS-44">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|page=44}}</ref>		The USTS included a list of gender terms allowing respondents to check off multiple selections, as well as the option to write in a gender that wasn't listed. From this section of the survey:<ref name="2015USTS-44">{{Cite web \|title=2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Complete Report \|date= \|access-date=23 October 2020 \|url= https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf\|page=44}}</ref>
	*31% of respondents checked "[[Non-binary]]"		*31% of respondents checked "[[Non-binary]]"
	*29% of respondents checked "[[Genderqueer]]"		* 29% of respondents checked "[[Genderqueer]]"
	*27% of respondents checked "[[Gender non-conforming]] or [[gender variant]]"		* 27% of respondents checked "[[Gender non-conforming]] or [[gender variant]]"
	*20% of respondents checked "[[Gender fluid]]/fluid"		*20% of respondents checked "[[Gender fluid]]/fluid"
	*18% of respondents checked "[[Androgynous]]"		*18% of respondents checked "[[Androgynous]]"
Line 50:		Line 52:
	*6% of respondents checked "[[Bi-gender]]"		*6% of respondents checked "[[Bi-gender]]"
	*5% of respondents checked "[[Butch]]"		*5% of respondents checked "[[Butch]]"
	*4% of respondents checked "[[Multi-gender]]"		* 4% of respondents checked "[[Multi-gender]]"
	*4% of respondents checked "[[Third gender]]"		* 4% of respondents checked "[[Third gender]]"
	*3% of respondents checked "[[Intersex]]"		*3% of respondents checked "[[Intersex]]"
	*2% of respondents checked "[[Drag\|Drag performer (king/queen)]]"		* 2% of respondents checked "[[Drag\|Drag performer (king/queen)]]"
	*1% of respondents checked "[[aggressive\|A.G. or aggressive]]"		*1% of respondents checked "[[aggressive\|A.G. or aggressive]]"
	*1% of respondents checked "[[Stud]]"		*1% of respondents checked "[[Stud]]"
	*1% of respondents checked "[[Travesti]]"		*1% of respondents checked "[[Travesti]]"
	*Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Bulldagger]]"		* Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Bulldagger]]"
	*Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Fa'afafine]]"		*Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Fa'afafine]]"
	*Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Mahu]]"		*Less than 1% of respondents checked "[[Mahu]]"
	*and 12% of respondents wrote in a gender not listed by the survey		* and 12% of respondents wrote in a gender not listed by the survey

	Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 nonbinary individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|last1=Hendrick \|first1=Janet \|last2=Meneghello \|first2=Richard \|last3= Behymer\|first3=Cheryl \|work=Law Week Colorado \|date=11 January 2018 \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180318162613/http://lawweekcolorado.com:80/2018/01/m-f-x-nonbinary-gender-designations-workplace/\|archive-date=18 March 2018}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>		Extrapolated from the 2015 USTS, it was estimated that there could be over 450,000 nonbinary individuals in the United States of America<ref name="Hendrick">{{Cite web \|title=“M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations In The Workplace \|last1=Hendrick \|first1=Janet \|last2=Meneghello \|first2=Richard \|last3= Behymer\|first3=Cheryl \|work=Law Week Colorado \|date=11 January 2018 \|url= https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-newsletters-article-m-f-or-x-nonbinary-gender-designations\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180318162613/http://lawweekcolorado.com:80/2018/01/m-f-x-nonbinary-gender-designations-workplace/\|archive-date=18 March 2018}}</ref>, although totally accurate numbers are difficult to ascertain.<ref>{{cite journal\|title=Micro Interactions, Macro Harms: Some Thoughts on Improving Health Care for Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Folks\|journal=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics \|last=Freeman\|first=Lauren\|year=2018\|doi=10.3138/ijfab.2018.05.29}}</ref>
Line 71:		Line 73:
	In a 2018 count, 0.2 percent of the USA homeless population (1,163 people) were nonbinary (where "nonbinary" was defined as "not male, female or transgender".)<ref name="NAEH">{{Cite web \|title=Demographic Data Project: Gender Minorities \|author=National Alliance to End Homelessness \|date= \|access-date=24 October 2020 \|url= https://endhomelessness.org/demographic-data-project-gender-minorities/}}</ref>		In a 2018 count, 0.2 percent of the USA homeless population (1,163 people) were nonbinary (where "nonbinary" was defined as "not male, female or transgender".)<ref name="NAEH">{{Cite web \|title=Demographic Data Project: Gender Minorities \|author=National Alliance to End Homelessness \|date= \|access-date=24 October 2020 \|url= https://endhomelessness.org/demographic-data-project-gender-minorities/}}</ref>

	====People 18 and older====		==== People 18 and older====
	A 2017 GLAAD/Harris Poll survey of 2,037 Americans age 18 and over found the following:<ref name="GLAAD">{{Cite web \|title=Accelerating Acceptance 2017 \|author= \|work=GLAAD \|date=2017 \|access-date=24 October 2020 \|url= https://www.glaad.org/files/aa/2017_GLAAD_Accelerating_Acceptance.pdf\|page=4}}</ref>		A 2017 GLAAD/Harris Poll survey of 2,037 Americans age 18 and over found the following:<ref name="GLAAD">{{Cite web \|title=Accelerating Acceptance 2017 \|author= \|work=GLAAD \|date=2017 \|access-date=24 October 2020 \|url= https://www.glaad.org/files/aa/2017_GLAAD_Accelerating_Acceptance.pdf\|page=4}}</ref>
	*[[Agender]] people:		*[[Agender]] people:
	**3% of 18-34 age group		**3% of 18-34 age group
	**less than 0.5% of 35-51 age group		**less than 0.5% of 35-51 age group
	**less than 0.5% of 52-71 age group		**less than 0.5% of 52-71 age group
	**1% of 72 or older age group		**1% of 72 or older age group
	*[[Genderfluid]] people:		* [[Genderfluid]] people:
	**3% of 18-34 age group		**3% of 18-34 age group
	**1% of 35-51 age group		**1% of 35-51 age group