Talk:Bottom surgery - Revision history

93.40.208.82: /* More types of non-conventional bottom surgery! */ new section

2020-08-11T01:18:08Z

More types of non-conventional bottom surgery!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 11 August 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)		: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
	:: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo\|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo\|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)		:: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo\|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo\|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

			== More types of non-conventional bottom surgery! ==

			I wanted to mention a few other options that I know to exist:

			Phalloplasty without removal of vagina is also possible, and it can include scrotoplasty too.
			Metodoioplasty can also be performed without removal of vagina and can still include scrotoplasty.

			I know of one example of the first, who has posted online about it.
			I know someone who did the second but was not comfortable posting it online, so I only have seen private photos.

			These can be options for trans men or for nonbinary people born with a vagina.

Ondo at 18:08, 19 February 2019

2019-02-19T18:08:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 19 February 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet\|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet\|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)		Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet\|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet\|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
	: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)		: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
			:: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo\|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo\|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Falkirks at 14:22, 19 February 2019

2019-02-19T14:22:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 19 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Retitle article?==		==Retitle article?==
	Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet\|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet\|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)		Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet\|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet\|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
			: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sekhet: Created page with "==Retitle article?== Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's..."

2019-02-19T04:21:52Z

Created page with "==Retitle article?== Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's..."

New page

==Retitle article?==
Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)