Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. Read the Privacy Policy to learn what information we collect about you and how we use it.
If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that. | | I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that. |
| --[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | | --[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
| |
| == Uncited claims that do not appear to reflect the reality ==
| |
|
| |
| The section on whether genderqueer people are trans is contrary to any of my understanding of being genderqueer. "It is common for genderqueer-identified people to consider trans and transgender to be synonymous with transition and so to claim genderqueer as a non-transgender identity," is especially jarring. As a genderqueer person who hangs out with other genderqueer people, this is exactly the opposite of how we view whether genderqueer people are trans. Unless someone has a citation, this (and probably the entire section) should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/108.34.174.33|108.34.174.33]]
| |