Robin Dembroff: Difference between revisions
imported>NumerousScorpions (Added a discussion of relevant work. Feel free to clean up.) |
imported>NumerousScorpions (→Work) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Dembroff has written multiple articles with implications for non-binary gender. | Dembroff has written multiple articles with implications for non-binary gender. | ||
In "Beyond the Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Kind", Dembroff argues that, through their focus on only "men" and "women", previous approaches to understanding the metaphysics of contribute to "systematic misunderstandings" of genderqueer persons (here used as an umbrella term)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin|date=2020|title=Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/DEMBBG-2|journal=Philosophers' Imprint|volume=20|issue=9|pages=1–23}}</ref>. Dembroff proposes a new concept, "critical gender kinds", defined as groups whose members subvert dominant gender ideologies. Since genderqueer people reject exclusive categorization as a binary gender, Dembroff argues that they constitute a possible "critical gender kind". | In "Beyond the Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Kind", Dembroff argues that, through their focus on only "men" and "women", previous approaches to understanding the metaphysics of gender contribute to "systematic misunderstandings" of genderqueer persons (here used as an umbrella term)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin|date=2020|title=Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/DEMBBG-2|journal=Philosophers' Imprint|volume=20|issue=9|pages=1–23}}</ref>. Dembroff proposes a new concept, "critical gender kinds", defined as groups whose members subvert dominant gender ideologies. Since genderqueer people reject exclusive categorization as a binary gender, Dembroff argues that they constitute a possible "critical gender kind". | ||
In "He/She/They/Ze", Dembroff (with Daniel Wodak) makes an argument against using gendered pronouns to refer to genderqueer individuals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin; Wodak|date=2018|title=He/She/They/Ze|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.12405314.0005.014|journal=Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy|volume=5|doi=https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.014|issn=2330-4014}}</ref> The authors also defend a more radical claim, asserting that there are ethical reasons to reject using gendered pronouns in general. | In "He/She/They/Ze", Dembroff (with Daniel Wodak) makes an argument against using gendered pronouns to refer to genderqueer individuals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin; Wodak|date=2018|title=He/She/They/Ze|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.12405314.0005.014|journal=Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy|volume=5|doi=https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.014|issn=2330-4014}}</ref> The authors also defend a more radical claim, asserting that there are ethical reasons to reject using gendered pronouns in general. | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 4 December 2020
 |
This article is a stub. You can help the Nonbinary wiki by expanding it! Note to editors: remember to always support the information you proved with external references! |
| Nationality | American |
|---|---|
| Pronouns | they/them[1][2] |
| Gender identity | genderqueer[1] |
| Occupation | professor of philosophy |
Robin Dembroff, Ph.D is an assistant professor of Philosophy at Yale University. They have written extensively about gender and associated topics such as pronouns and sexuality.[3]
Dembroff was raised in a conservative fundamentalist Christian household and, although they were "a gender nonconforming kid from the start", they remained closeted until the age of 21. They were mostly homeschooled before attending The Bible Institute of Los Angeles, a fundamentalist Christian college known as Biola for short, where they majored in philosophy. Spiritually, they are now agnostic.[4] They went on to attend the University of Notre Dame and Princeton University for further philosophy education.
Work
Dembroff has written multiple articles with implications for non-binary gender.
In "Beyond the Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Kind", Dembroff argues that, through their focus on only "men" and "women", previous approaches to understanding the metaphysics of gender contribute to "systematic misunderstandings" of genderqueer persons (here used as an umbrella term)[5]. Dembroff proposes a new concept, "critical gender kinds", defined as groups whose members subvert dominant gender ideologies. Since genderqueer people reject exclusive categorization as a binary gender, Dembroff argues that they constitute a possible "critical gender kind".
In "He/She/They/Ze", Dembroff (with Daniel Wodak) makes an argument against using gendered pronouns to refer to genderqueer individuals.[6] The authors also defend a more radical claim, asserting that there are ethical reasons to reject using gendered pronouns in general.
Links
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "Dress Smart – dapperQ Academics Featuring Robin Dembroff". dapperQ. 15 February 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
- ↑ "'It doesn't work for a whole lot of us': Should we torch the traditional gender binary?". Out In The Open with Piya Chattopadhyay - CBC Listen. 18 January 2019. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
- ↑ "Robin Dembroff (Yale University)". PhilPeople. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
- ↑ Sosis, Cliff (August 22, 2019). "Robin Dembroff Interview". What Is It Like to Be a Philosopher?. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ↑ Dembroff, Robin (2020). "Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind". Philosophers' Imprint. 20 (9): 1–23.
- ↑ Dembroff, Robin; Wodak (2018). "He/She/They/Ze". Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.014 Check
|doi=value (help). ISSN 2330-4014.