Research: Difference between revisions
m
→United States
imported>TXJ |
imported>TXJ m (→United States) |
||
| Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
::;'''Key Findings''': | ::;'''Key Findings''': | ||
::* A variety of gender identity labels were submitted by GNL respondents, including: | ::* A variety of gender identity labels were submitted by GNL respondents, including: | ||
:::*'Genderqueer' or 'queer' (42% of GNLs; 6% of the total sample) | :::*'[[Genderqueer]]' or 'queer' (42% of GNLs; 6% of the total sample) | ||
:::*'Both', 'either', 'neither', 'in-between', or 'non-binary' (9% of GNLs) | :::*'Both', 'either', 'neither', 'in-between', or 'non-binary' (9% of GNLs) | ||
:::*'Androgynous' or 'blended' (8% of GNLs) | :::*'Androgynous' or 'blended' (8% of GNLs) | ||
| Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
:::*'Bi-gender', 'Tri-gender', or 'third gender' (2% of GNLs) | :::*'Bi-gender', 'Tri-gender', or 'third gender' (2% of GNLs) | ||
:::*'Genderfuck', 'rebel', or 'radical' (1% of GNLs) | :::*'Genderfuck', 'rebel', or 'radical' (1% of GNLs) | ||
:::* A variety of unique responses, including: 'Birl'; 'Jest me';'Skaneelog'; 'Twidget'; 'Neutrois'; 'OtherWise'; 'gendertreyf'; 'trannydyke'; 'genderqueer wombat fantastica'; 'Best of Both'; 'gender blur'; and 'transgenderist'. | :::* A variety of unique responses, including: '[[Birl]]'; 'Jest me';'Skaneelog'; 'Twidget'; '[[Neutrois]]'; 'OtherWise'; 'gendertreyf'; 'trannydyke'; 'genderqueer wombat fantastica'; 'Best of Both'; '[[List of uncommon nonbinary identities#G|gender blur]]'; and 'transgenderist'. | ||
:::*Some responses for which the frequency was not reported, including: 'Pangender'; 'Hybrid'; 'Mahuwahine'; and 'Aggressive'. It is unclear from the report whether these were folded into other categories above for the purpose of producing statistics. | :::*Some responses for which the frequency was not reported, including: '[[Pangender]]'; 'Hybrid'; 'Mahuwahine'; and '[[Butch|Aggressive]]'. It is unclear from the report whether these were folded into other categories above for the purpose of producing statistics. | ||
::*GNLs were more likely than non-GNLs to be [ | ::*GNLs were more likely than non-GNLs to be [[Assigned_gender_at_birth|FAAB]]. They were also more likely, to be under 45, and/or to be multiracial, Black, or Asian. They were less likely than non-GNLs to be White or Latinx. In addition, GNLs were more likely than non-GNLs to live in California, the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic states, and the West (including Alaska and Hawaii), and less likely to live in the Midwest and South. | ||
::*GNLs had higher educational attainment than non-GNLs, but were more likely to live in extreme poverty - though this may be because they were, on the whole, younger than non-GNLs. | ::*GNLs had higher educational attainment than non-GNLs, but were more likely to live in extreme poverty - though this may be because they were, on the whole, younger than non-GNLs. | ||
::*GNLs were more likely than non-GNLs to have experienced harassment and sexual assault at school; they were also more likely to have experienced physical and/or sexual assault as adults. In addition, GNLs were more likely to have worked in an underground economy, postponed medical treatment for fear of discrimination, and/or attempted suicide, and were more likely to be uncomfortable with going to the police for help. Finally, they were also more likely to be HIV positive or of unknown HIV status, and more likely to be unemployed. To summarise, contrary to common perception, GNLs had experienced abuse, harassment, and discrimination at higher rates than non-GNLs. | ::*GNLs were more likely than non-GNLs to have experienced harassment and sexual assault at school; they were also more likely to have experienced physical and/or sexual assault as adults. In addition, GNLs were more likely to have worked in an underground economy, postponed medical treatment for fear of discrimination, and/or attempted suicide, and were more likely to be uncomfortable with going to the police for help. Finally, they were also more likely to be HIV positive or of unknown HIV status, and more likely to be unemployed. To summarise, contrary to common perception, GNLs had experienced abuse, harassment, and discrimination at higher rates than non-GNLs. | ||