Singular they: Difference between revisions
Reworked historical section (it was very repetitive before) and added quote to grammarian from 1905
imported>TXJ |
imported>Armorica Online (Reworked historical section (it was very repetitive before) and added quote to grammarian from 1905) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Grammatical concerns == | == Grammatical concerns == | ||
Although the singular they has been used in English informally for centuries, some grammarians have questioned its use based around arguments of grammatical correctness and formality. One of the main points of contention made by grammarians is that the singular they still acts grammatically as a plural would when acting upon verbs (which they consider to be unacceptable). Despite these concerns, which became particularly prominent during and after the 19th century, the singular they is documented to have been used by Shakespeare, Jane Austen, the Oxford English Dictionary, Louis Carroll, C. S. Lewis, among others.<ref>Henry Churchyard, "Singular 'Their' in Jane Austen and Elsewhere." http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html</ref> Ever since the end of the 20th century, the singular they has been growing in both formal and informal usage to serve different purposes, and is generally in standard use today. | |||
Singular "they" gets a surprising number of complaints, considering people use it all the time for people whose gender is unknown. However, there are a lot of arguments that it's correct. [http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/singular-they-and-the-many-reasons-why-its-correct/ This article on Motivated Grammar] goes through a few reasons, including the fact that it's consistently been in use since Chaucer's time, around 1400. Most people are familiar with how singular "they" works, as plenty of people use it all the time without really thinking about it. | The grammarian A. Knutson notes in his 1905 book ''The Gender of Words Denoting Living Beings in English, and the Different Ways of Expressing Difference in Sex'' the use of the singular they as a gender neutral term, pulling a quote from a magazine of the time:<blockquote>The privilege of addressing the sovereign when he or she came to dine... after ''their'' coronation.<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/genderofwordsden00knutrich|title=The Gender of Words Denoting Living Beings in English, and the Different Ways of Expressing Difference in Sex|last=Knutson|first=A.|publisher=Håkan Ohlsson|others=|year=1905|location=Lund|pages=3-4}}</ref></blockquote>Singular "they" gets a surprising number of complaints, considering people use it all the time for people whose gender is unknown. However, there are a lot of arguments that it's correct. [http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/singular-they-and-the-many-reasons-why-its-correct/ This article on Motivated Grammar] goes through a few reasons, including the fact that it's consistently been in use since Chaucer's time, around 1400. Most people are familiar with how singular "they" works, as plenty of people use it all the time without really thinking about it. | ||
A most comprehensive article about the history of singular "they" is Henry Churchyard's web-page, [http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html Singular 'Their' in Jane Austen and Elsewhere]. | A most comprehensive article about the history of singular "they" is Henry Churchyard's web-page, [http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html Singular 'Their' in Jane Austen and Elsewhere]. | ||