Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
→Keeping sexist language out: Mentioned my concerns.
imported>Cassolotl (→Front page is confusing!: Awesome) |
imported>Otvm (→Keeping sexist language out: Mentioned my concerns.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:[[User:Cassolotl|Cassolotl]]: I started making a nicer design for the main page [[User:NeoMahler/tests|here]], using the color scheme of the non-binary flag. I have incorporated your changes there, tell me what do you think! There's just one thing I don't like: new users or casual visitors don't need a list of templates. Templates are just maintenance stuff, that can attract potential editors, but they shouldn't be in the main page. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 15:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC) | :[[User:Cassolotl|Cassolotl]]: I started making a nicer design for the main page [[User:NeoMahler/tests|here]], using the color scheme of the non-binary flag. I have incorporated your changes there, tell me what do you think! There's just one thing I don't like: new users or casual visitors don't need a list of templates. Templates are just maintenance stuff, that can attract potential editors, but they shouldn't be in the main page. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 15:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]]: I'm fine with all of that. :) --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 21:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | ::[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]]: I'm fine with all of that. :) --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 21:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
==Keeping sexist language out== | |||
I know it can help new binary [[allies]] to say "both", but it contradicts the rest of the sentence by suggesting that there are only two genders. I think this could be viewed as sexist, even if the writer had good intentions. | |||