Packing/ru: Difference between revisions

381 bytes added ,  4 years ago
Created page with "Пакинг не обязателен для совершения перехода и не обязателен для того, что быть принятыми за му..."
imported>Shoterra
(Created page with "== Нужен ли вам пакинг? ==")
imported>Shoterra
(Created page with "Пакинг не обязателен для совершения перехода и не обязателен для того, что быть принятыми за му...")
Line 13: Line 13:
== Нужен ли вам пакинг? ==
== Нужен ли вам пакинг? ==


Packing is not a requirement to transition, nor is it required in order to be read as male. In most day-to-day situations, crotch bulges are not obvious, so packing would not make that much of a difference. However, in situations where the crotch is more exposed, packing is a safer option. Some of these situations may include swimming, wearing tight pants (especially when laying on your back) and wearing cycling leggings. In these situations, the lack of a crotch bulge could be quite telling.
Пакинг не обязателен для совершения перехода и не обязателен для того, что быть принятыми за мужчин. В большинстве повседневных ситуаций бугорок промежности не бросается в глаза, так что от него не будет большой разницы. Но все же, в ситуациях, где оэто более заметно, пакинг безопаснее. Список таких ситуаций включает в себя плавание, узкие брюки (особенно при лежани на спине) и надивание велосипедных бридж. В таких ситуациях отсутствие бугорка в промежности может быть замечено


Some people don't pack because it's a daily reminder of the body they actually have. Other don't do it because they don't feel it's necessary. Whether you should pack or not is a very personal question, and the answer greatly depends on each one's circumstances.
Some people don't pack because it's a daily reminder of the body they actually have. Other don't do it because they don't feel it's necessary. Whether you should pack or not is a very personal question, and the answer greatly depends on each one's circumstances.
Anonymous user