25
edits
User:Salem Diegos/Epidigital: Difference between revisions
m
→Theory
Salem Diegos (talk | contribs) m (→Theory) |
Salem Diegos (talk | contribs) m (→Theory) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing | Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing quasi-causality of gender identities. Contrary to the dichotomous perspectives frequently found in the gender study and media theory discourse, the epidigital renounces the preceding digital movement in favour of a nonbinary approach and metagender organology. | ||
Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements dominated by Cartesian dualism in the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting the intercontextualism of sexuality. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary epistomology and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations in gender sudy . | Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements dominated by Cartesian dualism in the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting the intercontextualism of sexuality. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary epistomology and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations in gender sudy . | ||