Page history
19 November 2006
21 October 2006
13 October 2006
29 September 2006
25 September 2006
7 September 2006
15 August 2006
7 August 2006
18 June 2006
13 June 2006
10 May 2006
Unprotecting - Based on discussion this page should be used to demonstrate currently common infobox template techniques of all kinds.
−37
Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting since consensus seems to be established
m
21 April 2006
Adding 'noinclude' tags since some pages are actually transcluding this one.
+23
Adding protection template. See Talk page.
+14
Protected Template:Infobox: Contents of page still disputed. Restoring protection and instituting straw poll. [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
mrmv conditionals. this is a _basic_ template for new template editors. Conditionals are not _basic_ tools.
−419
Restored Usage instructions (none available on the talk page)
+610
19 April 2006
attempt number 2...
m−27
Replace data5 "hack" with something clearer that *appears* to work in the same way.
−10
no edit summary
no edit summary
−27
no edit summary
+81
cleanup, convert qif to #if:
−662
18 April 2006
Removed protection - assume #if: has resolved the dispute
−36
Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting - hopefully #if: has resolved the dispute by superceding both methods
m
19 February 2006
protected
+36
rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected
+487
rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals
−487
rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox
+487
rvt to less complex code
−487
16 February 2006
rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original
m+487
removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors
−487
14 February 2006
13 February 2006
rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
+487
The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that
−487
12 February 2006
rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
+487
we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk
−487
11 February 2006
rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel
m+487
we had a compromise, see talk
−234
we had a compromise, see talk
−253
rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN
m+253
10 February 2006
6 February 2006
rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
m+487
Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
−134
rvt - sigh
+97