Talk:Lesbian: Difference between revisions
imported>MorningSparrow |
imported>Sekhet No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should we redirect "Lesbian" to the main article on orientations? Or should we retain "Lesbian" as this separate article? What justification do we have for either of these two actions? So far, I had been of the opinion that since the "lesbian" article is so brief, it should remain a section in the article on orientations, together with other women-attracted orientations. I believe "lesbian" should only have its own article here if it was expanded with a great deal more content, specifically with content that is on-topic about nonbinary identity, not just anything-everything lesbian, so that it was neither a stub nor off-topic. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 03:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | Should we redirect "Lesbian" to the main article on orientations? Or should we retain "Lesbian" as this separate article? What justification do we have for either of these two actions? So far, I had been of the opinion that since the "lesbian" article is so brief, it should remain a section in the article on orientations, together with other women-attracted orientations. I believe "lesbian" should only have its own article here if it was expanded with a great deal more content, specifically with content that is on-topic about nonbinary identity, not just anything-everything lesbian, so that it was neither a stub nor off-topic. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 03:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
I am activel working on expanding this article, and plan on adding more. However there is only so much time in a day. Pleae dont delete this. [[User:MorningSparrow|MorningSparrow]] ([[User talk:MorningSparrow|talk]]) 04:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | :I am activel working on expanding this article, and plan on adding more. However there is only so much time in a day. Pleae dont delete this. [[User:MorningSparrow|MorningSparrow]] ([[User talk:MorningSparrow|talk]]) 04:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|Sekhet|MorningSparrow}} yes, we talked about that on the Discord wiki channel and informally decided to keep it and focus on the nonbinary part of the topic instead of making it broad and generic. I think we need a content policy of some sort, now that it seems we are growing in community. I'll get on it as soon as possible and submit it to community approval. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 14:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
::: To clarify, since history is a large part of the lesbian identity, i thought it pertinent to include a brief section of modern lesbian history. [[User:MorningSparrow|MorningSparrow]] ([[User talk:MorningSparrow|talk]]) 16:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::Got it! Thanks for explaining that. I've got to get on the Discord wiki channel sometime so I don't miss out on things like that. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 02:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 16 April 2019
Redirect or retain?[edit source]
Should we redirect "Lesbian" to the main article on orientations? Or should we retain "Lesbian" as this separate article? What justification do we have for either of these two actions? So far, I had been of the opinion that since the "lesbian" article is so brief, it should remain a section in the article on orientations, together with other women-attracted orientations. I believe "lesbian" should only have its own article here if it was expanded with a great deal more content, specifically with content that is on-topic about nonbinary identity, not just anything-everything lesbian, so that it was neither a stub nor off-topic. -Sekhet (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- I am activel working on expanding this article, and plan on adding more. However there is only so much time in a day. Pleae dont delete this. MorningSparrow (talk) 04:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Sekhet and MorningSparrow: yes, we talked about that on the Discord wiki channel and informally decided to keep it and focus on the nonbinary part of the topic instead of making it broad and generic. I think we need a content policy of some sort, now that it seems we are growing in community. I'll get on it as soon as possible and submit it to community approval. --Ondo (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- To clarify, since history is a large part of the lesbian identity, i thought it pertinent to include a brief section of modern lesbian history. MorningSparrow (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Sekhet and MorningSparrow: yes, we talked about that on the Discord wiki channel and informally decided to keep it and focus on the nonbinary part of the topic instead of making it broad and generic. I think we need a content policy of some sort, now that it seems we are growing in community. I'll get on it as soon as possible and submit it to community approval. --Ondo (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)