Talk:LGBT: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:40, 19 November 2017

Does anyone think we should use "Q-word" instead of what is there, then create a separate page for people who feel comfortable with seeing it? --Otvm (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

@Otvm: I don't know how offensive is queer to LGBT+ people, but I guess it would be good. Q-word, however, it's vague in my opinion. We could add a link to Queer to the See also section of this page together with a content warning. What do you think? --NeoMahler (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:51, 19 November 2017 (edit) imported>Otvm (Created page with "Does anyone think we should use "Q-word" instead of what is there, then create a separate page for people who feel comfortable with seeing it? --~~~~")		Revision as of 18:40, 19 November 2017 (edit) (undo) Ondo (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Does anyone think we should use "Q-word" instead of what is there, then create a separate page for people who feel comfortable with seeing it? --[[User:Otvm\|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm\|talk]]) 17:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)		Does anyone think we should use "Q-word" instead of what is there, then create a separate page for people who feel comfortable with seeing it? --[[User:Otvm\|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm\|talk]]) 17:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
			:{{ping\|Otvm}} I don't know how offensive is ''queer'' to LGBT+ people, but I guess it would be good. ''Q-word'', however, it's vague in my opinion. We could add a link to [[Queer]] to the ''See also'' section of this page together with a content warning. What do you think? --[[User:NeoMahler\|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler\|talk]]) 18:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)