This claim has no sources, and seems offensive. Reducing a gender identity to a fetish is something that ought to come with plenty of evidence. I've never heard of any drones who based their identity on a fetish, and I know plenty of drones
Topic on Talk:Drone
This could actually seriously harm the image of dronegender people if someone who isn't educated stumbles across the enry. I'm going to remove the line for now until it's sourced.
Sure! I added that given that it sounded like the implication you were making in the queer section. It started as a fetish -> it's now a gender, therefore there is a relationship. But I might have misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying!
I'll clarify so you know for next time. Dronification is to drones, as force-feminisation is to women. Lots of cis men enjoy force-feminisation fetish despite not identifying as women. But the fetish wouldn't make any sense if the gender of woman didn't already exist. The existence of dronification also doesn't make any sense unless a drone is something that already exists.
If you said that "trans woman" is a gender that's based on force feminisation, that would be silly.