447
edits
Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Are social networks good for references?: new section
imported>Cassolotl |
(→Are social networks good for references?: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::{{ping|NeoMahler}} Looks like it's marked resolved! Awesome. :) --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 17:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC) | :::{{ping|NeoMahler}} Looks like it's marked resolved! Awesome. :) --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 17:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Are social networks good for references? == | |||
There are pages, like [[multigender]], were almost all references are links to tumblr, which is a blog service/social network. I propose to remove these references and the corresponding content if we can't find any other references. Any thoughts? --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 11:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC) | |||