447
edits
Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Are social networks good for references?
imported>Cassolotl m (→Are social networks good for references?: Oops typo) |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::The notability and reliability of blogs is a very difficult thing to judge. I imagine Wikipedia has some good resources on this! But it seems like a slightly separate issue, I think? --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 19:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC) | :::The notability and reliability of blogs is a very difficult thing to judge. I imagine Wikipedia has some good resources on this! But it seems like a slightly separate issue, I think? --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 19:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::{{ping|Cassolotl}} well, as far as I know, Wikipedia doesn't allow blogs at all. At least the Catalan version. Anyway, ok, makes sense. So I will disable the abuse filter and change the template to "this page contains links to Tumblr blogs who are not notable". Thanks for your input! :) --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 19:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
== AFAB/AMAB or the written-out forms? == | == AFAB/AMAB or the written-out forms? == | ||