3
edits
Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1 (edit)
Revision as of 15:04, 16 April 2019
, 5 years ago→Content Policy
| Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
:: {{ping|Falkirks}} I'm not sure I understand what you mean with that. Could you re-phrase? Or even better, you can add it to the draft directly! :) Also, the page has a couple of '''[BOLD]''' parts that need to be discussed. Do you have any ideas for them? --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 14:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | :: {{ping|Falkirks}} I'm not sure I understand what you mean with that. Could you re-phrase? Or even better, you can add it to the draft directly! :) Also, the page has a couple of '''[BOLD]''' parts that need to be discussed. Do you have any ideas for them? --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 14:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: Perhaps its not a good fit for a content policy, but I feel like it should be written somewhere. I wanted it to point out that just because someone is non-binary doesn't make them qualified to write about everything in the wiki, we have a lot of content about non-western identities and non-English languages. And that as a policy someone who belongs to a specific group (eg: A two spirit person wanting to edit the article on two spirit people) shouldn't be edited over or argued with by people who are less connected to that identity. And even if our sources disagree with what they are saying, we should do our best to find new sources. I don't mean this to police anyone, just to make it clear to potential new editors that we want to support them. I will try to look at the other parts later today. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 15:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | |||