447
edits
User talk:Sekhet: Difference between revisions
→Uncommon identities
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::: How about the popularity rating is relabeled, so that identities of at least 0.20% popularity or higher are called "present," "extant," "attested," or something along those lines, whereas the label "almost not used" is reserved for identities that were less than 0.20% of the survey? -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 23:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC) | ::: How about the popularity rating is relabeled, so that identities of at least 0.20% popularity or higher are called "present," "extant," "attested," or something along those lines, whereas the label "almost not used" is reserved for identities that were less than 0.20% of the survey? -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 23:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::: You mean changing the scale to a binary (:P) option? That could be an option, why not. I will ask our users on discord to take a look at this conversation to get their opinions. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 16:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | :::: You mean changing the scale to a binary (:P) option? That could be an option, why not. I will ask our users on discord to take a look at this conversation to get their opinions. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 16:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::: A member of the Discord suggested to remove the label altogether and leave the percentage only. I like this, what do you think? --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 17:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||