445
edits
Talk:Books: Difference between revisions
→Links
imported>Bean3000 No edit summary |
(→Links) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::{{ping|Ondo}} If we do that, we'd eventually have to do the same thing as for the nonbinary fiction section. I can't always tell what these books are about just from their titles. If we could also give a brief description, the gender of the person writing it, etc etc. We can still include the citation though. --[[User:Bean3000|Bean3000]] ([[User talk:Bean3000|talk]]) 08:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Ondo}} If we do that, we'd eventually have to do the same thing as for the nonbinary fiction section. I can't always tell what these books are about just from their titles. If we could also give a brief description, the gender of the person writing it, etc etc. We can still include the citation though. --[[User:Bean3000|Bean3000]] ([[User talk:Bean3000|talk]]) 08:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::{{ping|Bean3000}} citations are the standard way of referencing a book (not only in a wiki), so I think they should be included. But yes, a brief description is a good idea too. What about a table with two columns: citation and description? --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 09:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC) | |||