Agender/ru: Difference between revisions

231 bytes added ,  4 years ago
Created page with "Нет полного согласия о разнице между такими терминами как агендер, бесполый, гендерно нейтраль..."
imported>Shoterra
(Created page with "'''gendernull.''' Он был описан Baaphomett как, "Пустой гендер, только без пустоты."<ref>[http://mogai-archive.tumblr.com/post/917361...")
imported>Shoterra
(Created page with "Нет полного согласия о разнице между такими терминами как агендер, бесполый, гендерно нейтраль...")
Line 36: Line 36:
==Разница между бесполыми и нейтроис==
==Разница между бесполыми и нейтроис==


There is little agreement about the difference between terms such as agender, genderless, non-gender, gender neutral, and [[Neutrois|neutrois]]. These terms are often used interchangeably, or defined differently by individual writers in ways that don't necessarily match the self-definitions of others using those terms.
Нет полного согласия о разнице между такими терминами как агендер, бесполый, гендерно нейтральный и[[Neutrois|нейтроис]]. Эти слова часто используются как синонимы, или по разному определяются разными писателями, и не обязательно совпадают с самоопределнием других людей, называющих себя этими терминами.


It is often said that non-gender or genderlessness is the experience of having ''no'' gender identity at all, whereas gender neutral or neutrois is the experience of ''having'' a gender identity, a gender identity which is not male or female, but neutral. However, these statements don't match the experiences of everyone who has taken up these identities as their own. This is a result of a disagreement between word definitions that are ''prescriptivist'' (telling everyone how they ''should'' use a word, and saying that many people use it wrong) and ''descriptivist'' (describing how people have actually been ''using'' a word, without telling them to change).
It is often said that non-gender or genderlessness is the experience of having ''no'' gender identity at all, whereas gender neutral or neutrois is the experience of ''having'' a gender identity, a gender identity which is not male or female, but neutral. However, these statements don't match the experiences of everyone who has taken up these identities as their own. This is a result of a disagreement between word definitions that are ''prescriptivist'' (telling everyone how they ''should'' use a word, and saying that many people use it wrong) and ''descriptivist'' (describing how people have actually been ''using'' a word, without telling them to change).
Anonymous user