445
edits
imported>Niki Skylark (→DID) |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid." | Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid." | ||
--[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark | |||
== History == | |||
I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Link to genderflux == | |||
I would suggest that a link to genderflux is added since the description is found in the text (being fluid from having a gender to having non/agender) | |||
:Hi! There's already a link to the [[genderflux]] page in the infobox (the quick info table in the top right of the article). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 10:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Is it bad that... == | |||
Konnichiwa! | |||
Is it "bad" if i say that I'm gender-fluid but also gender apathetic? Cause i feel like a mix of both... --[[Special:Contributions/2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC|2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC]] 21:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC) or Ritsu-chan | |||
== Move did == | |||
we should move did to neurogender we already have a neurogender page and should move the section to a neurogender | |||
:Hi! I disagree, the DID section here is about the genderfluid identity, not about the neurogender identity. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 05:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |