Talk:Genderfluid: Difference between revisions

1,537 bytes added ,  7 months ago
no edit summary
imported>Niki Skylark
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid."
Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid."
--[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark
== History ==
I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
== Link to genderflux ==
I would suggest that a link to genderflux is added since the description is found in the text (being fluid from having a gender to having non/agender)
:Hi! There's already a link to the [[genderflux]] page in the infobox (the quick info table in the top right of the article). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 10:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
== Is it bad that... ==
Konnichiwa!
Is it "bad" if i say that I'm gender-fluid but also gender apathetic? Cause i feel like a mix of both... --[[Special:Contributions/2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC|2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC]] 21:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC) or Ritsu-chan
== Move did ==
we should move did to neurogender we already have a neurogender page and should move the section to a neurogender
:Hi! I disagree, the DID section here is about the genderfluid identity, not about the neurogender identity. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 05:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)