Gender abolitionism: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Corrected a typo.)
Tag: 2017 source edit
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


'''Gender abolitionism''' broadly refers to viewpoints that advocate the dissolution of [[Gender role|gender roles]] and gender norms.<ref>https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/5898</ref> A related term is '''postgenderism''', the idea that human culture should advance beyond gender.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postgenderism</ref>
'''Gender abolitionism''' broadly refers to viewpoints that advocate the dissolution of [[Gender role|gender roles]] and gender norms.<ref>Cull, Matthew J. 2019. “Against Abolition”. ''Feminist Philosophy Quarterly'' 5 (3). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2019.3.5898.</ref> A related term is '''postgenderism''', the idea that human culture should advance beyond gender.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postgenderism</ref>


One source writes that "gender abolition is about dismantling the basal structures of the [[sexism|patriarchy]], not about barring people from expressing their identity" and that "gender abolition does not prevent people from engaging with [[masculinity]] and [[femininity]] and constructing their identities around those concepts."<ref>https://cherwell.org/2021/10/09/gender-abolition-why-it-matters/</ref>
One source writes that "gender abolition is about dismantling the basal structures of the [[sexism|patriarchy]], not about barring people from expressing their identity" and that "gender abolition does not prevent people from engaging with [[masculinity]] and [[femininity]] and constructing their identities around those concepts."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://cherwell.org/2021/10/09/gender-abolition-why-it-matters/ |title=Gender abolition: Why it matters |date=9 October 2021 |author=Anonymous |work=Cherwell}}</ref>
 
[[Feminism|Feminist]] Andrea Dworkin wrote in 1974 of an idealized, gender-abolitionist future society:
{{quote|...by changing our premises about men and women, role-playing, and polarity, the social situation of [[transsexual]]s will be transformed, and transsexuals will be integrated into community, no longer persecuted and despised. [In this way], community built on [[androgynous]] identity will mean the end of transsexuality as we know it. Either the transsexual will be able to expand his/her sexuality into a fluid androgyny, or, as [[gender roles|roles]] disappear, the phenomenon of transsexuality will disappear and that energy will be transformed into new modes of sexual identity and behavior.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/john-stoltenberg-andrew-dworkin-was-trans-ally/ |last=Stoltenberg |first=John|title=Andrea Dworkin Was a Trans Ally| date=8 April 2020 |work=Boston Review}}</ref>}}


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}