Gender neutral language in French: Difference between revisions

* '''refeminization'''<ref name=":0">Divergenres (2021): ''Guide de grammaire neutre et inclusive''. Québec. Online at: https://divergenres.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/guide-grammaireinclusive-final.pdf, p. 3.</ref>''':''' Before the 17th century, French would have — as Italian, Spanish and other romance languages still have today — a feminin inflection for female professionals. However, for several reasons (societal<ref name=":1">Becquelin, Hélène: ''Langage en tout genre. Argument historique''. Université de Neuchâtel. Online at: https://www.unine.ch/epicene/home/pourquoi/argument-historique.html (12.12.2023).</ref>, linguistic<ref name=":2">MOREAU, Marie-Louise. ''L’accord de proximité dans l’écriture inclusive. Peut-on utiliser n’importe quel argument ?'' In : ''Les discours de référence sur la langue française'' [en ligne]. Bruxelles : Presses de l’Université Saint-Louis, 2019 (généré le 12 décembre 2023). Disponible sur Internet : <<nowiki>http://books.openedition.org/pusl/26517</nowiki>>. ISBN : 9782802802457. DOI : <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.26517</nowiki>.</ref> — the French language was being standardized and dialect speakers had to learn French), grammarians made sure that the feminin denominations vanished from the language<ref name=":1" />. Today, a lot of people talk of "feminization", because they feel like these person descriptions are neologisms. In fact, they aren't, since they are being recuperated from an older version of the French language, which is why "refeminization" is more accurate. Even though it sounds counter-intuitive, refeminization is part of degenderizing the French language, since studies from different languages<ref>Tibblin, J., Weijer, J. van de, Granfeldt, J., & Gygax, P. (2023). There are more women in joggeur·euses than in joggeurs : On the effects of gender-fair forms on perceived gender ratios in French role nouns. ''Journal of French Language Studies, 33'', 28‑51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269522000217.</ref><ref>Heise, E. (2003). Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen [Even empathic students are men: The generic masculine and the mental representation of persons]. ''Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis, 35''(2), 285–291.</ref><ref>Gygax, P., Sato, S., Oetl, A. & Gabriel, U. (2021). The masculine form and its multiple interpretations: a challenge for our cognitive system. ''Language Sciences, 83''. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101328.</ref><ref>Lisa Irmen, Ute Linner (2005): Die Repräsentation generisch maskuliner Personenbezeichnungen. In: ''Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology'' 213:3, 167-175.</ref><ref>Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019). A Language Index of Grammatical Gender dimensions for those interested in the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. ''Frontiers in Psychology. 10:1604.'' doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604.</ref><ref>Friederike Braun, Susanne Oelkers, Karin Rogalski, Janine Bosak, Sabine Sczesny (2007): “Aus Gründen der Verständlichkeit ...“: Der Einfluss generisch maskuliner und alternativer Personenbezeichnungen auf die kognitive Verarbeitung von Texten. In: ''Themenheft: Kognitionspsychologische Beiträge zu Genus und Sexus in der Sprache 58'' (3). DOI: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.58.3.183</nowiki>.</ref><ref>Gygax P.M., Schoenhals L., Lévy A., Luethold P. and Gabriel U. (2019). Exploring the Onset of a Male-Biased Interpretation of Masculine Generics Among French Speaking Kindergarten Children. ''Frontiers in Psychology. 10:1225''. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01225.</ref><ref>Dagmar Stahlberg, Sabine Sczesny (2001): Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den Gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen. In: ''Psychologische Rundschau'' 52(3), 131-140. </ref><ref>Sato, Oetl, Gabriel & Gygax (2017). Assessing the impact of gender grammaticization on thought: A psychological and psycholinguistic perspective. ''Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie (OBST), 90.''</ref><ref>Bross, F. & Kurz, L. (2023). Zur Wahrnehmung des generischen Maskulinums in Erstgliedern von Komposita und maskuliner Epizöna. ''Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik'', ''51''(3), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2023-2022.</ref><ref>Sato, S., Gygax, P., & Gabriel, U. (2016). Gauging the impact of gender grammaticization in different languages: Application of a linguistic-visual paradigm. ''Frontiers in Psychology – Language Sciences, 7, 140.''</ref><ref>Susanne Günthner (2019): Sprachwissenschaft und Geschlechterforschung: Übermittelt unsere Sprache ein androzentrisches Weltbild? In: ''Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung'' 65, 571-579.</ref><ref>Sato, S., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2016). Changing male-dominant representations in German: A study on nominalized adjectives and participles. ''Journal of Language and Social Psychology, First View.'' doi: 10.1177/0261927X15625442.</ref><ref>Vervecken, D., Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., Hannover, B. (2015). Warm businessmen, cold housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. ''Frontiers in Psychology – Cognition.'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437.</ref><ref>Lévy, A., Gygax, P., & Gabriel, U., (2014). Fostering the generic interpretation of grammatically masculine forms: When my aunt could be one of the mechanics. ''The Journal of Cognitive Psychology'', 26, 27-38.</ref><ref>Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O. & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender representation in language and grammatical cues: When beauticians, musicians and mechanics remain men. ''Discourse Processes, 49,'' 481-500''.''</ref><ref>Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Lévy, A., Pool, E., Grivel, M., & Pedrazzini, E. (2012). The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. ''Journal of Cognitive Psychology'', ''24'', 395-408.</ref><ref>Pascal Gygax, Sandrine Zufferey, Ute Gabriel (2021): ''Le cerveau pense-t-il au masculin ? Cerveau, langage et représentations sexistes''. Le Robert: Paris.</ref><ref>ALONZO Philippe, SILVERA Rachel, « Le genre masculin n'est pas neutre », ''Travail, genre et sociétés'', 2000/1 (N° 3), p. 23-24. DOI : 10.3917/tgs.003.0023. URL : https://www.cairn.info/revue-travail-genre-et-societes-2000-1-page-23.htm.</ref><ref>Brauer Markus. Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte ? L’impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales. In: ''L'année psychologique''. 2008 vol. 108, n°2. pp. 243-272. URL: www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_2008_num_108_2_30971.</ref> have shown that the generic masculine is cognitively not neutral, even though the French prescriptive grammar considers it neutral<ref name=":3">Alchimy (2017): « Le masculin l’emporte sur le féminin » : Bien plus qu’une règle de grammaire. ''Usbek&Rica'': "Selon Le Bon Usage de Maurice Grevisse, l'adjectif se met donc au 'genre indifférencié, c'est-à-dire au masculin'."</ref>. By mentioning also the feminine form of a person description, speakers visualize people of more genders than just one (see references above).

|Les '''nombreuses''' filles et garçons.

|}