Editing Nonbinary Wiki:Uncommon identities

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. Read the Privacy Policy to learn what information we collect about you and how we use it.

If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{policy}}
{{policy}}
This wiki considers that an identity is uncommon or not widely used when there is not enough objective evidence of a large number of people using it. This may be because the only source speaking about this term is a poor source (such as the MOGAI Archive or other dead links), or because they lack evidence that people have ever held those identities (for example, terms that were proposed, but were only adopted by one person, or perhaps by nobody at all).
This wiki considers that an identity is uncommon or not widely used when there is not enough objective evidence of a large number of people using it. This may be because the only source speaking about this term is a poor source (such as the MOGAI Archive or other dead links), or because they lack evidence that people have ever held those identities. (For example, terms that were proposed, but were only adopted by one person, or perhaps by nobody at all.)


When an identity meets one of these requirements, it is no longer considered uncommon:
When an identity meets one of these requirements, it is no longer considered uncommon:


* At least 1% of participants in a survey with at least 1,000 answers focused on nonbinary people in general (and not just a subset of identities) chose this identity to describe themselves.
* There's research or other strong evidence showing significant numbers of people (anywhere in the world) hold the identity or have done in the past.
* At least 0.2% of participants in a survey focused on nonbinary people in general (and not just a subset of identities) chose this identity to describe themselves. Additionally, the identity has appeared in a non-primary source.
* At least a 0.20% of people identified as the gender in a large community survey, such as the [[Gender Census]].
* A full article on Wikipedia is enough for an identity to be considered notable, since Wikipedia already has high notability standards. A section of a larger article is not enough for this point. Wikis other than Wikipedia are not valid sources for this point.
* It's notable due to being associated with a public figure, major news story, significant publication, documentary, etc.
* It's notable because a social network or website has allowed users to choose or write in the identity and large numbers have done so (ideally with demographics given).
* It's notable because a sizeable community has been organised around the identity, or one has existed in the past.


Pages about gender identities that don't meet these requirements are marked with the {{tl|uncommon identity}} template. Please note that this does not necessarily mean that the identity is not valid, it's just an indicator to show that very few people use this term.
Pages about gender identities that don't meet these requirements are marked with the {{tl|uncommon identity}} template. Please note that this does not necessarily mean that the identity is not valid, it's just an indicator to show that very few people use this term.
Please note that all contributions to Nonbinary Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see Nonbinary Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)