Talk:Genderfluid: Difference between revisions
→History: new section
imported>Niki Skylark m (trying again to sign my name) |
imported>Oolong (→History: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid." | Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid." | ||
--[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark | --[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark | ||
== History == | |||
I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | |||