Jump to content

Talk:Genderfluid: Difference between revisions

→‎History: new section
imported>Niki Skylark
m (trying again to sign my name)
imported>Oolong
(→‎History: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid."
Some people who have thought that they might have DID or multiplicity might find that it works better to call themselves genderfluid."
--[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark
--[[User:Niki Skylark|Niki Skylark]] ([[User talk:Niki Skylark|talk]]) 15:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Niki Skylark
== History ==
I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.