Talk:Genderfluid: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Oolong
(→‎History: new section)
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
I just made an account because I thought it would be worth adding a couple of notes on the history of the term [https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/77468 from the OED]: it goes back to at least 1987, discussing the gender of God; a 1993 publication used it in something like the modern sense, to describe the audience at a Suede gig. --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] ([[User talk:Oolong|talk]]) 14:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
== Link to genderflux ==
I would suggest that a link to genderflux is added since the description is found in the text (being fluid from having a gender to having non/agender)
:Hi! There's already a link to the [[genderflux]] page in the infobox (the quick info table in the top right of the article). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 10:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
== Is it bad that... ==
Konnichiwa!
Is it "bad" if i say that I'm gender-fluid but also gender apathetic? Cause i feel like a mix of both... --[[Special:Contributions/2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC|2605:A601:AFCA:DC00:3547:4DB9:AAA4:E1DC]] 21:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC) or Ritsu-chan
== Move did ==
we should move did to neurogender we already have a neurogender page and should move the section to a neurogender
:Hi! I disagree, the DID section here is about the genderfluid identity, not about the neurogender identity. --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 05:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)