User talk:Sekhet: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Sekhet
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:


Hi! Just a small heads-up about your last edit in [[Fluidflux]], when you added {{tl|uncommon identity}}. Fluidflux is not considered uncommon because it had more than the 0.20% of respondents in the last Gender Census. You can read more about when to use this template [[Nonbinary Wiki:Uncommon identities|here]]. Thanks! --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 20:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Just a small heads-up about your last edit in [[Fluidflux]], when you added {{tl|uncommon identity}}. Fluidflux is not considered uncommon because it had more than the 0.20% of respondents in the last Gender Census. You can read more about when to use this template [[Nonbinary Wiki:Uncommon identities|here]]. Thanks! --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 20:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
: Okay. Thanks for explaining where the cutoff really is for that. The "almost not used" label that was already on the fluidflux article made me think it also counted as "uncommon." Maybe we should word that differently? -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 15:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Anonymous user