Template:Infobox: Revision history

19 February 2006

• curprev 08:2808:28, 19 February 2006‎ m>Jtkiefer‎ 1,618 bytes +36‎ protected undo
• curprev 08:1808:18, 19 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected undo
• curprev 08:0908:09, 19 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals undo
• curprev 07:2007:20, 19 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox undo
• curprev 05:4305:43, 19 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ rvt to less complex code undo

16 February 2006

• curprev 05:0705:07, 16 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original undo
• curprev 04:5404:54, 16 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors undo

14 February 2006

• curprev 05:3205:32, 14 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - it is for me if it is for you undo
• curprev 05:2005:20, 14 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ reverting this "at will" is not an option. undo

13 February 2006

• curprev 22:3722:37, 13 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise undo
• curprev 18:2118:21, 13 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that undo

12 February 2006

• curprev 04:4404:44, 12 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected undo
• curprev 04:3704:37, 12 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk undo

11 February 2006

• curprev 05:0905:09, 11 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel undo
• curprev 03:1803:18, 11 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −234‎ we had a compromise, see talk undo
• curprev 03:1703:17, 11 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ we had a compromise, see talk undo
• curprev 02:1902:19, 11 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +253‎ rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN undo

10 February 2006

• curprev 13:3313:33, 10 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ this latest change is very confusing undo

6 February 2006

• curprev 08:0808:08, 6 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore undo
• curprev 08:0708:07, 6 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −134‎ Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed undo
• curprev 08:0208:02, 6 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ rvt - sigh undo
• curprev 07:5907:59, 6 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −97‎ including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them undo

5 February 2006

• curprev 15:5415:54, 5 February 2006‎ m>Marknew‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ Added link to Template:Infobox Conditionals undo

4 February 2006

• curprev 08:2608:26, 4 February 2006‎ m>WGFinley‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - and still no consensus to do it undo
• curprev 06:3906:39, 4 February 2006‎ m>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification. undo
• curprev 06:2106:21, 4 February 2006‎ m>WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv undo
• curprev 06:1606:16, 4 February 2006‎ m>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have. undo

3 February 2006

• curprev 20:0920:09, 3 February 2006‎ m>WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage undo
• curprev 06:3306:33, 3 February 2006‎ m>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups undo
• curprev 05:3705:37, 3 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rvt, this is Infobox 101 undo
• curprev 05:3605:36, 3 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus undo
• curprev 05:3305:33, 3 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ using conditionals should not be taught to new users undo
• curprev 05:3005:30, 3 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt per talk undo
• curprev 05:1105:11, 3 February 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ using conditionals sets a bad example for new template creators undo
• curprev 04:5604:56, 3 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt as per talk undo
• curprev 04:4804:48, 3 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ remove conditional instructions undo

1 February 2006

• curprev 22:5022:50, 1 February 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt - consensus is on talk undo
• curprev 22:4622:46, 1 February 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ remove conditionals until concensus on method and whether to even include them at all is reached undo
• curprev 15:3015:30, 1 February 2006‎ m>Ta bu shi da yu‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Oops. Unintentional rollback - apologies to all, this was a mistake. undo
• curprev 15:3015:30, 1 February 2006‎ m>Ta bu shi da yu‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ Reverted edits by Locke Cole (talk) to last version by Netoholic undo

31 January 2006

• curprev 20:3220:32, 31 January 2006‎ m>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt undo
• curprev 20:1320:13, 31 January 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rmv conditionals. This is "Infobox 101" undo
• curprev 18:0218:02, 31 January 2006‎ m>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Conditionals are extremely useful in creating infobox templates. The description is also quite clear. undo
• curprev 16:5216:52, 31 January 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rvt to Trodel - as this is for inexperience template editors, conditionals should be avoided, per talk undo
• curprev 14:2714:27, 31 January 2006‎ m>Marknew‎ m 1,582 bytes −6‎ Correct image tags undo
• curprev 12:1312:13, 31 January 2006‎ m>Ligulem‎ 1,588 bytes +456‎ rv. avoiding conditionals at the cost of template forking is bad. We will have them in MediaWiki anyway undo
• curprev 12:0512:05, 31 January 2006‎ m>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −456‎ use of conditionals should be avoided - having an instructional template advocate their use is contraray to that aim undo
• curprev 08:0908:09, 31 January 2006‎ m>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,588 bytes +456‎ Revert - conditionals are very important for infobox design, since there will often be optional parameters. undo

30 January 2006

• curprev 21:1421:14, 30 January 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes 0‎ img size undo
• curprev 21:1221:12, 30 January 2006‎ m>Netoholic‎ m 1,132 bytes −6‎ tpyo