Talk:Genderqueer: Difference between revisions
imported>NumerousScorpions (→Original research: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that. | I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that. | ||
--[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | --[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Uncited claims that do not appear to reflect the reality == | |||
The section on whether genderqueer people are trans is contrary to any of my understanding of being genderqueer. "It is common for genderqueer-identified people to consider trans and transgender to be synonymous with transition and so to claim genderqueer as a non-transgender identity," is especially jarring. As a genderqueer person who hangs out with other genderqueer people, this is exactly the opposite of how we view whether genderqueer people are trans. Unless someone has a citation, this should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/108.34.174.33|108.34.174.33]] | |||