Agender/fi: Difference between revisions

    imported>Maria airaM
    No edit summary
    imported>Maria airaM
    (Created page with "On jonkin tasoista yhteisymmärrystä siitä, miten sukupuolettomuus, ei-sukupuolisuus ja neutrois eroavat termeinä toisistaan. Näitä termejä ei usein käytetä synonyymei...")
    Line 36: Line 36:
    ==Erot sukupuolettomuuden ja neutroissin välillä==
    ==Erot sukupuolettomuuden ja neutroissin välillä==


    There is little agreement about the difference between terms such as agender, genderless, non-gender, gender neutral, and [[Neutrois|neutrois]]. These terms are often used interchangeably, or defined differently by individual writers in ways that don't necessarily match the self-definitions of others using those terms.
    On jonkin tasoista yhteisymmärrystä siitä, miten sukupuolettomuus, ei-sukupuolisuus ja neutrois eroavat termeinä toisistaan. Näitä termejä ei usein käytetä synonyymeinä, vaan kuvaavat tiettyä tilannetta. Kuitenkin moni kirjoittaja valitsee itse, miten termit määrittelee, vaikkei määritelmät aina täsmää termeihin identifioivien henkilöiden kokemuksiin.


    It is often said that non-gender or genderlessness is the experience of having ''no'' gender identity at all, whereas gender neutral or neutrois is the experience of ''having'' a gender identity, a gender identity which is not male or female, but neutral. However, these statements don't match the experiences of everyone who has taken up these identities as their own. This is a result of a disagreement between word definitions that are ''prescriptivist'' (telling everyone how they ''should'' use a word, and saying that many people use it wrong) and ''descriptivist'' (describing how people have actually been ''using'' a word, without telling them to change).
    It is often said that non-gender or genderlessness is the experience of having ''no'' gender identity at all, whereas gender neutral or neutrois is the experience of ''having'' a gender identity, a gender identity which is not male or female, but neutral. However, these statements don't match the experiences of everyone who has taken up these identities as their own. This is a result of a disagreement between word definitions that are ''prescriptivist'' (telling everyone how they ''should'' use a word, and saying that many people use it wrong) and ''descriptivist'' (describing how people have actually been ''using'' a word, without telling them to change).