3
edits
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
:* [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]]: Both articles have basically the same content. Which one do you think is better? | :* [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]]: Both articles have basically the same content. Which one do you think is better? | ||
:I'm going to check the templates, modules and pages under the ''Nonbinary.org:'' namespace. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 10:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC) | :I'm going to check the templates, modules and pages under the ''Nonbinary.org:'' namespace. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 10:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|NeoMahler}} Posting to twitter is fine by me. Thanks for asking. | |||
::* [[Gender-variant identities worldwide]] sounds good. | |||
::* I prefer [[Assigned gender at birth]] because it matches the commonly used [[AMAB]] and [[AFAB]], but either works. | |||
::* [[Demigender]] sounds good. | |||
:: * [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]], the [[Nonbinary]] one is missing the "History" section, but I can't really decide which is better. | |||
:: [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 15:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC) |