Jump to content

Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Line 191: Line 191:
:* [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]]: Both articles have basically the same content. Which one do you think is better?
:* [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]]: Both articles have basically the same content. Which one do you think is better?
:I'm going to check the templates, modules and pages under the ''Nonbinary.org:'' namespace. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 10:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
:I'm going to check the templates, modules and pages under the ''Nonbinary.org:'' namespace. --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 10:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
::{{ping|NeoMahler}} Posting to twitter is fine by me. Thanks for asking.
::* [[Gender-variant identities worldwide]] sounds good.
::* I prefer [[Assigned gender at birth]] because it matches the commonly used [[AMAB]] and [[AFAB]], but either works.
::* [[Demigender]] sounds good.
:: *  [[Nonbinary]] and [[Nonbinary gender]], the [[Nonbinary]] one is missing the "History" section, but I can't really decide which is better.
:: [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 15:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.