441
edits
imported>TXJ |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::I agree the first idea sounds good! --[[User:TXJ|TXJ]] ([[User talk:TXJ|talk]]) 19:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC) | ::I agree the first idea sounds good! --[[User:TXJ|TXJ]] ([[User talk:TXJ|talk]]) 19:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Even the pared-down list includes a lot of binary people who are intersex or eunuch, so the 607 is a bit inflated. I've started creating separate pages when I can find a good source that they are indeed nonbinary. Sometimes (like with Tash Sultana) there are a lot of news pieces claiming they're nonbinary but nothing in the person's own words to back that up (Indeed, Sultana is supposedly "open on social media about being nonbinary" but I found nothing in my search)--[[User:TXJ|TXJ]] ([[User talk:TXJ|talk]]) 17:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC) | ::Even the pared-down list includes a lot of binary people who are intersex or eunuch, so the 607 is a bit inflated. I've started creating separate pages when I can find a good source that they are indeed nonbinary. Sometimes (like with Tash Sultana) there are a lot of news pieces claiming they're nonbinary but nothing in the person's own words to back that up (Indeed, Sultana is supposedly "open on social media about being nonbinary" but I found nothing in my search)--[[User:TXJ|TXJ]] ([[User talk:TXJ|talk]]) 17:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::{{ping|TXJ}} ok, after some more tinkering, this list now explicitly excludes people with "intersex" or "eunuch" as their "sex or gender" field: https://w.wiki/M3m (352 results). However, it will also exclude nonbinary intersex people, for example, so not sure which one is more accurate. Nothing I can do about the sources, though. It's probably better to avoid using sources that don't come from the person when it comes to identity. Thank you for your hard work! --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 20:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC) |