Page history
6 February 2006
5 February 2006
4 February 2006
rv - and still no consensus to do it
−450
Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification.
+450
rv
m−450
um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have.
+450
3 February 2006
rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage
m−450
Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups
+450
rvt, this is Infobox 101
−450
rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus
m+450
using conditionals should not be taught to new users
−450
rvt per talk
m+450
using conditionals sets a bad example for new template creators
−450
rvt as per talk
m+450
remove conditional instructions
−450
1 February 2006
rvt - consensus is on talk
m+450
remove conditionals until concensus on method and whether to even include them at all is reached
−450
Oops. Unintentional rollback - apologies to all, this was a mistake.
+450
Reverted edits by Locke Cole (talk) to last version by Netoholic
m−450
31 January 2006
rvt
+450
rmv conditionals. This is "Infobox 101"
−450
Conditionals are extremely useful in creating infobox templates. The description is also quite clear.
+450
rvt to Trodel - as this is for inexperience template editors, conditionals should be avoided, per talk
−450
Correct image tags
m−6
rv. avoiding conditionals at the cost of template forking is bad. We will have them in MediaWiki anyway
+456
use of conditionals should be avoided - having an instructional template advocate their use is contraray to that aim
−456
Revert - conditionals are very important for infobox design, since there will often be optional parameters.
+456
30 January 2006
img size
tpyo
m−6
rmv all conditionals, except standard param defaults
−197
remove use of conditional templates including those using hiddenStructure
−228
29 January 2006
I agree with Netoholic on this - hiddenstructure should be in the example templates as the if templates, while not an emergency should be avoided
−25
rvt - there is no WP:POINT violation in removing code which does not work properly. This template is a guide to infoboxes and should not promote a bad design.
+25
rvt WP:POINT
−25
Improving accessibility
+25
26 January 2006
18 January 2006
17 January 2006
clarify data3
+36
rmv pipes from data4/5 - that's what data3 demonstrates
+2
added some | in order to throw less {{{}}} stuff onto clients (look at html source)
+4