Robin Dembroff: Difference between revisions
imported>NumerousScorpions (→Work) |
imported>TXJ No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox person | {{Infobox person | ||
| picture= | | picture= | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
Dembroff has written multiple articles with implications for non-binary gender, both in academic philosophy and the popular press. | Dembroff has written multiple articles with implications for non-binary gender, both in academic philosophy and the popular press. | ||
In a 2018 paper co-authored with Daniel Wodak, Dembroff makes an ethical argument against using gendered pronouns to refer to genderqueer individuals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin; Wodak|date=2018|title=He/She/They/Ze|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.12405314.0005.014|journal=Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy|volume=5|doi= | In a 2018 paper co-authored with Daniel Wodak, Dembroff makes an ethical argument against using gendered pronouns to refer to genderqueer individuals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin; Wodak|date=2018|title=He/She/They/Ze|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.12405314.0005.014|journal=Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy|volume=5|doi=10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.014|issn=2330-4014}}</ref> The authors also defend a more radical claim, asserting that there are ethical reasons to reject using gendered pronouns in general. | ||
In their 2020 paper "Beyond the Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Kind", Dembroff argues that, through a narrow focus on only "men" and "women", previous approaches to understanding the metaphysics of gender contribute to "systematic misunderstandings" of genderqueer persons (here used as an umbrella term)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin|date=2020|title=Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/DEMBBG-2|journal=Philosophers' Imprint|volume=20|issue=9|pages=1–23}}</ref>. Dembroff proposes a new concept, "critical gender kinds", defined as groups whose members subvert dominant gender ideologies. Since genderqueer people reject exclusive categorization as a binary gender, Dembroff argues that they constitute a possible "critical gender kind". | In their 2020 paper "Beyond the Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Kind", Dembroff argues that, through a narrow focus on only "men" and "women", previous approaches to understanding the metaphysics of gender contribute to "systematic misunderstandings" of genderqueer persons (here used as an umbrella term)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dembroff|first=Robin|date=2020|title=Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/DEMBBG-2|journal=Philosophers' Imprint|volume=20|issue=9|pages=1–23}}</ref>. Dembroff proposes a new concept, "critical gender kinds", defined as groups whose members subvert dominant gender ideologies. Since genderqueer people reject exclusive categorization as a binary gender, Dembroff argues that they constitute a possible "critical gender kind". | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||