Talk:Singular they: Difference between revisions
imported>Otvm (Added my concerns.) |
imported>Otvm |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==On the "Traditional" Nature of the Words "Gender" and "Sex" and their Usage== | ==On the "Traditional" Nature of the Words "Gender" and "Sex" and their Usage== | ||
{{ping|2602:306:3793:4460:89E7:575:135E:8789}} I personally think this is a case where only transphobes and binarists would be referring to a person's "sex". I think it would be better to either use "gender presentation" or "gender", since grammarians are not going to use airport scanning technology when they try to talk to people... --[[User:Otvm|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm|talk]]) 21:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | {{ping|2602:306:3793:4460:89E7:575:135E:8789}} I personally think this is a case where only transphobes, biological essentialists, and binarists would be referring to a person's "sex". I think it would be better to either use "gender presentation" or "gender", since grammarians are not going to use airport scanning technology when they try to talk to people... --[[User:Otvm|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm|talk]]) 21:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 3 December 2017
On the "Traditional" Nature of the Words "Gender" and "Sex" and their Usage
@2602:306:3793:4460:89E7:575:135E:8789: I personally think this is a case where only transphobes, biological essentialists, and binarists would be referring to a person's "sex". I think it would be better to either use "gender presentation" or "gender", since grammarians are not going to use airport scanning technology when they try to talk to people... --Otvm (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)