|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Documentation subpage}}
| |
| {{high-risk| 2700000+ }}
| |
| {{AWB standard installation}}
| |
| {{csdoc|lua}}
| |
| {{csdoc|cs1}}
| |
|
| |
| {{csdoc|lead|web sources that are not characterized by another CS1 template}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Usage== | | ==Usage== |
| {{csdoc|usage}} | | {{csdoc|usage}} |
| Line 17: |
Line 9: |
| {{end}} | | {{end}} |
| {{csdoc|usage vertical common}} | | {{csdoc|usage vertical common}} |
| <!-- Please synchronize this list with the corresponding one at the overview page [[Wikipedia:Citation templates#Examples]] -->
| |
| <pre style="margin:0px; border:none; white-space:pre;"> | | <pre style="margin:0px; border:none; white-space:pre;"> |
| {{cite web | | {{cite web |
| Line 220: |
Line 211: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| {{csdoc|usage vertical end}} | | {{csdoc|usage vertical end}} |
|
| |
| ===Choosing between {{tlf|Cite web}} and {{tlf|Cite news}}===
| |
| {{anchor|Consistency}}
| |
| Before 2014, editors had to decide whether to use {{tl|Cite web}} or {{tlf|Cite news}} based on their features. In 2014, however, {{em|most of}} the differences between the two templates were eliminated.
| |
|
| |
| As of {{diff|Module:Citation/CS1|732205428|723907342|29 July 2016}}, {{tlf|Cite web}} and {{tlf|Cite news}} have the following differences:
| |
| *{{tlf|Cite news}} can be used for offline (paper) sources whereas {{tlf|Cite web}} generates a missing URL error when no URL is provided
| |
| *{{tlf|Cite news}} accepts {{para|issue}} and {{para|volume}} parameters while {{tlf|Cite web}} does not (See {{section link|1=Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 10|2=|volume=, |issue=, |page(s)= and cite magazine}}.)
| |
| But given the same set of valid parameters, their output is exactly the same:
| |
| <!-- ATTENTION!
| |
| The following example only serves to demonstrate parameter rending results.
| |
|
| |
| Whether you must include all these parameters in actual articles is not a concern here.
| |
| -->
| |
| {|
| |
| | '''Cite web''': || {{cite web |url=http://blog.chron.com/techblog/2011/07/microsoft-envisions-a-universal-os-but-it-might-not-be-called-windows/ |title=Microsoft envisions a universal OS, but it might not be called Windows |last=Silverman |first=Dwight |date=July 15, 2011 |work=[[Houston Chronicle]] |publisher=[[Hearst Corporation]] |accessdate=May 26, 2015}}
| |
| |-
| |
| | '''Cite news''': || {{cite news |url=http://blog.chron.com/techblog/2011/07/microsoft-envisions-a-universal-os-but-it-might-not-be-called-windows/ |title=Microsoft envisions a universal OS, but it might not be called Windows |last=Silverman |first=Dwight |date=July 15, 2011 |work=[[Houston Chronicle]] |publisher=[[Hearst Corporation]] |accessdate=May 26, 2015}}
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Examples== | | ==Examples== |
| Line 1,683: |
Line 1,655: |
|
| |
|
| ==See also== | | ==See also== |
| {{Citation Style 1}} | | * {{tl|cite book}} |
| {{Wikipedia referencing}} | | * {{tl|cite journal}} |
| {{UF-COinS}} | | * {{tl|cite news}} |
|
| |
|
| <includeonly> | | <includeonly> |
| {{#ifeq:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|sandbox||
| | [[Category:Templates]] |
| [[Category:Citation Style 1 templates|W]] | |
| }}
| |
| </includeonly> | | </includeonly> |