User:Salem Diegos/Epidigital: Difference between revisions
Salem Diegos (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
m (Ondo moved page Epidigital to User:Salem Diegos/Epidigital without leaving a redirect: probably out of scope; moving to user space until issues can be resolved) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Epidigital''' is a conceptual framework that has emerged in contemporary cultural discourse, serving as a reaction to the postdigital tendencies of the late 20th century. Introduced by Ryota Matsumoto in 2021, | {{delete|Not relevant to gender}} | ||
'''Epidigital''' is a conceptual framework that has emerged in contemporary cultural discourse, serving as a reaction to the postdigital tendencies of the late 20th century. Introduced by Ryota Matsumoto in 2021, a media theorist and forefather of postdigital architecture movement at the gender study program at Asagay College of Art and Design, the term seeks to describe the evolving landscape of art and media in the nonbinary post-xenofeminism age. | |||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing | Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing quasi-causality of gender identities. Contrary to the dichotomous perspectives frequently found in the gender study and media theory discourse, the epidigital renounces the preceding digital movement in favour of a nonbinary approach and metagender organology. | ||
Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements dominated by Cartesian dualism in the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary | Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements dominated by Cartesian dualism in the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting the intercontextualism of sexuality. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary epistomology and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations in gender sudy . | ||
== Further Reading == | == Further Reading == | ||
https://www.insightsofayoungecologicalartist.com/artfeatures/in-conversation%3A-ryota-matsumoto | |||
https://artworkgallery.net/interviews/interview-with-ryota-matsumoto | |||
https://monoskop.org/Epidigital | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 20 August 2023
 |
This page is a candidate for possible deletion and will be reviewed by an administrator. If you think this page shouldn't be deleted, you may leave a message in the talk page. The following reason has been specified: Not relevant to gender |
Epidigital is a conceptual framework that has emerged in contemporary cultural discourse, serving as a reaction to the postdigital tendencies of the late 20th century. Introduced by Ryota Matsumoto in 2021, a media theorist and forefather of postdigital architecture movement at the gender study program at Asagay College of Art and Design, the term seeks to describe the evolving landscape of art and media in the nonbinary post-xenofeminism age.
Theory[edit | edit source]
Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing quasi-causality of gender identities. Contrary to the dichotomous perspectives frequently found in the gender study and media theory discourse, the epidigital renounces the preceding digital movement in favour of a nonbinary approach and metagender organology.
Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements dominated by Cartesian dualism in the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting the intercontextualism of sexuality. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary epistomology and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations in gender sudy .
Further Reading[edit | edit source]
https://www.insightsofayoungecologicalartist.com/artfeatures/in-conversation%3A-ryota-matsumoto
https://artworkgallery.net/interviews/interview-with-ryota-matsumoto