Editing Talk:Bottom surgery
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | : I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | :: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | ||