Jump to content

Talk:Genderqueer: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>NumerousScorpions
(→‎Original research: new section)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that.
I think it would be better to engage with specific written sources and attempt to synthesize the definitions given there. The "History" section does a decent job of that.
--[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
--[[User:NumerousScorpions|NumerousScorpions]] ([[User talk:NumerousScorpions|talk]]) 00:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
== Uncited claims that do not appear to reflect the reality ==
The section on whether genderqueer people are trans is contrary to any of my understanding of being genderqueer. "It is common for genderqueer-identified people to consider trans and transgender to be synonymous with transition and so to claim genderqueer as a non-transgender identity," is especially jarring. As a genderqueer person who hangs out with other genderqueer people, this is exactly the opposite of how we view whether genderqueer people are trans. Unless someone has a citation, this should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/108.34.174.33|108.34.174.33]]
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.