25
edits
Salem Diegos (talk | contribs) m (Minor edit) Tag: 2017 source edit |
Salem Diegos (talk | contribs) m (→Theory) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing compositions of different artistic assemblages. Contrary to the dichotomous perspectives frequently found in postdigital art discourse, the epidigital renounces the preceding digital movement in favour of | Epidigital is not confined to specific forms of artistic practices. Instead, it is characterized by its dynamic nature, embodying the flows, streams, and ever-changing compositions of different artistic assemblages. Contrary to the dichotomous perspectives frequently found in postdigital art discourse, the epidigital renounces the preceding digital movement in favour of a nonbinary approach. | ||
Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements of the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary categories and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations. | Furthermore, the epidigital paradigm diverges from the master narratives that defined art movements of the past century. In the epidigital approach, meaning-making processes operate in a nonbinary framework, continually shifting and adapting. It emphasizes that social production in the arts demands a fusion of varied elements, which typically exist as nonbinary categories and are frequently detached from the broader spectrum of ecological and cultural interrelations. |
edits