Jump to content

List of uncommon nonbinary identities: Difference between revisions

only dos genders yah yah
(This is all just stupid. KYS)
Tags: Replaced Reverted Visual edit
(only dos genders yah yah)
Tags: Reverted 2017 source edit
Line 4: Line 4:
In order to keep the wiki accurate to the lived experiences of nonbinary people, identities should only be listed here if they cite from at least two separate external sources, showing both:
In order to keep the wiki accurate to the lived experiences of nonbinary people, identities should only be listed here if they cite from at least two separate external sources, showing both:


1. origin (such as a source about how the term was coined, or at least history of the term's use), and
1. Only use the Gender as seen below:
 
Male and Female
2. evidence that the identity has actually been used as someone's own identity. Acceptable evidence includes presence in at least one Gender Census result, a news article, or published nonfiction book describing an actual person using it.
 
A design for a pride flag does not count toward origin or evidence of use. A personal blog does not count toward evidence of use. A source citation of a web page counts if it is either a live link, or an archive of a dead link, but dead links by themselves are not acceptable.


* This is all just bullshit.  
* This is all just bullshit.  
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.