441
edits
Nonbinary Wiki:General discussion/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Are social networks good for references?
imported>Cassolotl (→Are social networks good for references?: Adding some info about a rule that we had on the old nonbinary.org wiki.) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
I would be in favour of this rule being introduced here, too. --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 12:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | I would be in favour of this rule being introduced here, too. --'''[[User:Cassolotl|<span style="color:#008000">Cassolotl</span>]]''' ''<small>([[User_Talk:Cassolotl|talk]]) <span style="color:#808080">pronouns: they/them</span></small>'' 12:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
:{{ping|Cassolotl}} better late than never! So what exact requisites you used? more than 100 or 200 notes on tumblr? Or just ban tumblr entirely? --[[User:NeoMahler|NeoMahler]] ([[User talk:NeoMahler|talk]]) 14:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
== AFAB/AMAB or the written-out forms? == | == AFAB/AMAB or the written-out forms? == | ||