3
edits
Nonbinary Wiki talk:Style guide: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::{{ping|Falkirks}} I assume making this search with a bot should be easy. Could you take care of it? Include any variation of the LGBT+ acronym. Thanks! --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 14:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Falkirks}} I assume making this search with a bot should be easy. Could you take care of it? Include any variation of the LGBT+ acronym. Thanks! --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 14:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: Yup! I can get that done either today or tomorrow. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ::: Yup! I can get that done either today or tomorrow. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::: I excluded internal links (to LGBT) from the results and this is what I got: | |||
* LGB (3) | |||
* LGBT (153) | |||
* LGBTT (11) | |||
* LGBTI (2) | |||
* LGBT+ (13) | |||
* LGBTQ (26) | |||
* LGBTIQ (3) | |||
* LGBTQ+ (7) | |||
* LGBTQI (12) | |||
* LGBTQIA+ (1) | |||
:::: These are rough numbers, and a lot of the variety comes from articles which are glossaries or speciifcally talk about the variety of terms. But it does seem that we have a strong bias for "LGBT" right now. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 17:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | |||