Talk:Gender neutral language: Difference between revisions

Talk:Gender neutral language (edit)

Revision as of 04:28, 13 November 2017

370 bytes added , 6 years ago

no edit summary

Falkirks

Bureaucrats, Check users, Interface administrators, Administrators

3

edits

Revision as of 20:40, 5 November 2017 (edit) imported>Otvm No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:28, 13 November 2017 (edit) (undo) Falkirks (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:{{ping\|NeoMahler}} In more traditional, English-speaking, western contexts, "neutral" often has the connotation of "for both male and female", maybe unintentionally. I think "inclusive" would make it clearer for cisgender people visiting the wiki. People usually use signs which have (sexist) symbols to mean "man" and "woman" together when they want to make a sign for a "gender neutral" bathroom, at least in the country I currently reside in. --[[User:Otvm\|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm\|talk]]) 20:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)		:{{ping\|NeoMahler}} In more traditional, English-speaking, western contexts, "neutral" often has the connotation of "for both male and female", maybe unintentionally. I think "inclusive" would make it clearer for cisgender people visiting the wiki. People usually use signs which have (sexist) symbols to mean "man" and "woman" together when they want to make a sign for a "gender neutral" bathroom, at least in the country I currently reside in. --[[User:Otvm\|Otvm]] ([[User talk:Otvm\|talk]]) 20:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
			:: I agree with [[User:Otvm\|Otvm]], but I don't see an easy replacement for this title. Maybe we should add a warning to article? I think changing the title to "Nongendered language" would be false advertsing (but I think [[Nongendered language]] should exist as a separate article) [[User:Falkirks\|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)