6,546
edits
Livejournal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Livejournal is a social media platform centered around journaling created in 1999. Users can upload entries to their personal journals, follow other users' journals, and make and receive comments on individual entries. The site also allows users to create and join "communities", which generally allow members to upload their own entries and serve as hubs for discussion of shared interests. | Livejournal is a social media platform centered around journaling created in 1999. Users can upload entries to their personal journals, follow other users' journals, and make and receive comments on individual entries. The site also allows users to create and join "communities", which generally allow members to upload their own entries and serve as hubs for discussion of shared interests. | ||
Livejournal was one of the biggest online platforms for trans youth in the 2000s, and the first known Livejournal communities with a [[nonbinary]] focus appeared in 2002.<ref>Dame-Griff, Avery. ''The Two Revolutionsː A History of the Transgender Internet.'' New York, New York University Press. 2023.</ref> Nonbinary people also participated in some general trans communities, such as a community for "FTMs".<ref name=":3">Zimman, Lal, and Hayworth, Will. "Lexical Change as Sociopolitical Change in Trans and Cis Identity Labels: New Methods for the Corpus Analysis of Internet Data". ''Selected Papers from New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV 47)''. January 15 2020. https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/45253</ref> | |||
Trans scholar Cassius Adair views the social networks of queer and trans young people that formed on Livejournal as a precursor to | Trans scholar Cassius Adair views the social networks of queer and trans young people that formed on Livejournal as a precursor to nonbinary and [[transmasculine]] networking on [[Tumblr]].<ref>Adair, Cassius. "Delete Yr Account: Speculations on Trans Digital Lives and the Anti-Archival, Part I: Are You Sure?". Digital Research Ethics Collaboratory. 2019.</ref> Linguistic researchers Zimman and Hayworth express a similar view.<ref name=":3" /> | ||
== Non-binary Communities == | == Non-binary Communities == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
As of 2025, the community had 3003 members and 25,450 journal entries.<ref name=":5" /> | As of 2025, the community had 3003 members and 25,450 journal entries.<ref name=":5" /> | ||
A linguistic analysis of entries and comments conducted by Lal Zimman and Will Hayworth suggests that "genderqueer" was the most popular term in this community for people outside the binary, followed by "genderfuck".<ref name=":3" /> Another paper by Zimman and Hayworth asserts that "non-binary" overtook "genderqueer" and became the most common term in around 2007.<ref name=":4" /> | A linguistic analysis of entries and comments conducted by Lal Zimman and Will Hayworth suggests that "genderqueer" was the most popular term in this community for people outside the binary, followed by "genderfuck".<ref name=":3" /> Another paper by Zimman and Hayworth asserts that "non-binary" overtook "genderqueer" and became the most common term in this space around 2007.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
"Agender", "bigender", "polygender", and "genderfluid" also appear in the dataset from the ftm community.<ref name=":3" /> "Polygender", the least-used term, appeared only in early years, while "agender" (another uncommon term) showed up more often in later years.<ref name=":4" /> | "Agender", "bigender", "polygender", and "genderfluid" also appear in the dataset from the ftm community.<ref name=":3" /> "Polygender", the least-used term, appeared only in early years, while "agender" (another uncommon term) showed up more often in later years.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
Scholar Stephanie Clare argues that within this community space, "non-binary" emerged as a less-confrontational alternate to "genderqueer" and "genderfuck". Clare describes a conflict in this space between members transitioning towards masculinity and members who sought to abolish gender. The former contingent sometimes viewed the latter "genderqueer" contingent as holding negative attitudes towards FTM transition. According to Clare, the emerging term "non-binary" implied a desire for more gender options rather than the destruction of the gender system, lacking the controversial associations of "genderqueer" and "genderfuck".<ref>Clare, Stephanie D. ''Nonbinaryː A Feminist Autotheory''. Cambridge, Cambridge Press, June 2023. </ref> | |||
== Removal of "Unspecified" Gender Option == | == Removal of "Unspecified" Gender Option == | ||