Jump to content

Nonbinary Wiki:Uncommon identities: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(raising minimum to 20)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This wiki considers that an identity is poorly attested when it still has insufficient notability. This may be because the only source speaking about this term is a poor source (such as the MOGAI Archive or other dead links), or because they lack evidence that people have ever held those identities. (For example, terms that were proposed, but were only adopted by one person, or perhaps by nobody at all.)
This wiki considers that an identity is poorly attested when it still has insufficient notability. This may be because the only source speaking about this term is a poor source (such as the MOGAI Archive or other dead links), or because they lack evidence that people have ever held those identities. (For example, terms that were proposed, but were only adopted by one person, or perhaps by nobody at all.)


When an identity meets these requeriments, it is no longer considered poorly attested:
When an identity meets one of these requeriments, it is no longer considered poorly attested:


* There's research or other strong evidence showing significant numbers of people (anywhere in the world) hold the identity or have done in the past.
* There's research or other strong evidence showing significant numbers of people (anywhere in the world) hold the identity or have done in the past.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.