445
edits
Talk:Bottom surgery: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | Should we retitle this article from "bottom surgery" to "lower surgery"? I've seen the latter term in use, recently, and I'm just of the opinion that it's a better name. -[[User:Sekhet|Sekhet]] ([[User talk:Sekhet|talk]]) 04:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
: I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | : I like "lower surgery" better too, but I can't think of a compelling reason to change it. They both seem like ok terms that are in use. Even if we don't rename, we should probably still update the intro paragraph with "lower surgery" included as well. [[User:Falkirks|Falkirks]] ([[User_talk:Falkirks|talk]]) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:: I agree that both terms should be included in the introduction, and we should create redirections too. As for the name of the main article, I would leave it as ''bottom surgery'' (I had never heard the expression ''lower surgery'' before). --[[User:Ondo|Ondo]] ([[User talk:Ondo|talk]]) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC) | |||